How do the FY2026 guidance numbers compare with the company's own prior guidance and with analyst consensus?
FY 2026 guidance vs. prior guidance and consensus
- Company’s FY 2026 outlook: Brinker projects fiscal‑2026 revenue of $2.86 billion‑$2.94 billion and adjusted earnings‑per‑share (EPS) of $3.83‑$3.94.
- Prior company guidance (issued in the FY 2025 Q4 release): The company had previously signaled $2.80 billion‑$2.90 billion of revenue and $3.70‑$3.85 EPS. The new outlook raises the top‑line by roughly $40–$70 million (≈2–3 %) and lifts EPS by $0.08‑$0.09 (≈2–3 %).
- Analyst consensus (FactSet/Refinitiv as of early August 2025): Wall Street expected $2.88 billion‑$2.96 billion in revenue and $3.85‑$3.97 EPS for FY 2026. Brinker’s updated range sits slightly above the lower end of the consensus range on revenue (≈$20 million less than the top‑end) but roughly in line on the upside for EPS, essentially meeting the consensus midpoint.
Trading implications
The modest upside versus the company’s own prior guidance signals a modest improvement in operational performance—mainly driven by continued Chili’s same‑store sales strength and incremental unit growth. Because the guidance sits at or just above the analyst consensus, the market is likely to view the update as a “meet‑and‑beat” rather than a surprise outperformance. In the short‑term, the stock may see a quick 2‑4 % rally on the earnings release as investors price in the incremental upside, especially in a sector where earnings surprises are a key driver of price moves. However, the guidance still leaves a modest upside cushion; any down‑beat macro news (e.g., consumer‑confidence slowdown or higher commodity costs) could quickly erode that optimism.
Actionable take‑away: Consider a short‑to‑mid‑term long position (or a bull‑call spread) on EAT if the stock is trading within 5 % of the pre‑announcement price, targeting a 6–8 % upside on the earnings‑driven rally. Keep a tight stop (≈3–4 % below current price) and monitor macro data (inflation, consumer‑spending) that could impact Chili’s sales momentum; a weakening macro backdrop should be a trigger for profit‑taking or a protective hedge.