What are the updated capital expenditure requirements for Thacker Pass and how are they being financed?
Updated Capâex and Funding Structure
LithiumâŻAmericas disclosed in its Q2â2025 filing that the capitalâexpenditure envelope for the ThackerâŻPass project has been revised upward to ââŻ$2.2âŻbillion (approximately $600âŻmillion higher than the prior estimate). The company now expects to fund this outlay through a tiered financing package:
1. Equity raise â roughly $500âŻmillion of new equity, primarily sourced from a public offering and a private placement tied to a longâterm offâtake agreement with a major EVâmanufacturing partner.
2. Debt financing â a senior secured loan facility of up to $1.0âŻbillion that will be drawn down in tranches as construction milestones are met.
3. Partner contributions â the jointâventure partner, Albemarle, will provide approximately $700âŻmillion in cash and inâkind contributions (including equipment and services) under the existing partnership agreement.
Trading Implications
The upward revision in capâex pushes the projectâs cost base higher, but the diversified financing mixâparticularly the sizable equity infusion tied to a firm offâtake and the robust senior debt capacityâmitigates dilution concerns and signals strong creditor confidence. In the short term, the news has been priced in modestly; LAC shares have been trading near the highâend of their 60âday range, reflecting a balance between the higher cash demand and the upside of a secured supply chain to a rapidly expanding EV market. Traders with bullish exposure to the lithium sector might consider adding to long positions on a pullâback, targeting the $25â$27 price zone, while monitoring the upcoming financing covenant dates (Q4â2025) for any potential liquidity squeezes that could trigger temporary downside volatility. In the longer view, the secured financing and partnership support provide a solid foundation for Thacker Pass to become a cornerstone asset in the U.S. lithium supply chain, which could sustain a mediumâterm price premium for LAC relative to peers lacking comparable financing structures.