How does PAN-DA’s performance, cost, and capabilities compare to existing C‑UAS solutions from competitors such as Dedrone, DroneShield, and Raytheon? | WRAP (Aug 14, 2025) | Candlesense

How does PAN-DA’s performance, cost, and capabilities compare to existing C‑UAS solutions from competitors such as Dedrone, DroneShield, and Raytheon?

Performance & Capabilities

PAN‑DA is a hand‑held, kinetic‑capture system that uses the BolaWrap 150 to snare a drone’s rotors and bring it down within seconds. Its strength lies in instant, on‑the‑spot neutralisation of low‑altitude, small‑to‑medium UAVs (≀ 5 kg) at ranges of 5–15 m. By contrast, Dedrone and DroneShield focus on detection‑plus‑non‑kinetic mitigation (RF jamming, directed‑energy, or software‑based “soft‑kill”). Their solutions can cover larger perimeters (hundreds of meters) and handle swarms, but they still rely on a networked architecture and often need a vehicle or fixed‑site platform. Raytheon’s C‑UAS offerings are the most high‑end, integrated – radar, electro‑optical sensors, and kinetic interceptors – designed for critical‑infrastructure protection with ranges beyond 1 km and the ability to engage multiple threats simultaneously. PAN‑DA therefore trades depth of coverage for speed, portability and simplicity, filling a niche of personal, quick‑reaction protection that larger systems cannot match.

Cost

Because PAN‑DA is a single‑use, handheld device, its unit cost is expected to be in the low‑hundreds of dollars (the BolaWrap 150 line is marketed at ≈ $200–$300). Dedrone’s subscription‑based detection platform runs in the $10k–$30k per site range, while DroneShield’s “Drone‑Defender” kits are priced around $5k–$10k for a limited‑area kinetic system, and Raytheon’s integrated solutions can exceed $100k for a full‑scale deployment. The stark price differential gives Wrap Technologies a low‑barrier‑to‑adoption advantage for private‑sector users (e.g., construction, event security) and for law‑enforcement units that need a “grab‑and‑go” capability without the logistics of a larger C‑UAS suite.

Trading Implications

- Upside catalyst: PAN‑DA’s unique, low‑cost, personal‑use proposition could open a new sub‑segment of the $6.8 bn C‑UAS market, especially as regulators tighten rules on kinetic neutralisation. Early contracts with municipal police or private security firms would likely trigger a price rally for Wrap Technologies (WRAP).

- Risk considerations: The system’s limited range and payload capacity mean it cannot replace the broader detection‑neutralisation ecosystems that Dedrone, DroneShield, and Raytheon dominate. Market adoption will hinge on regulatory approval for kinetic capture and the ability to demonstrate reliability against a variety of drone designs.

- Actionable stance: Maintain a moderate‑to‑long exposure on WRAP, with a focus on entry on pull‑backs near the 20‑day moving average. Watch for press releases on government procurement or partnerships with security firms as a trigger for upside. Simultaneously, monitor regulatory developments (e.g., FAA/DOJ stance on kinetic C‑UAS) that could either accelerate or constrain PAN‑DA’s rollout.