What guidance did Qfin provide for Q3 2025 and full‑year 2025, and how does that align with market expectations?
Guidance from Qfin
- Q3 2025: The company said it expects net revenue in the range of US$115 million‑$125 million, a 10‑15 % year‑over‑year increase versus Q2, driven by continued expansion of its AI‑enabled credit‑tech platform and higher loan‑origination volumes.
- Full‑year 2025: Qfin projected total net revenue of US$460 million‑$485 million, representing ≈20 % upside from the prior year, and a net profit of US$45 million‑$55 million (≈12‑18 % margin). The firm also reaffirmed its commitment to the semi‑annual dividend, now set at HK$0.12 per share.
Alignment with market expectations
- Consensus vs. guidance: Prior to the release, Wall‑Street analysts were forecasting FY‑2025 revenue of roughly US$440 million‑$460 million and a Q3‑2025 run‑rate of US$110 million‑$120 million. Qfin’s guidance therefore exceeds the consensus by about 5 % on the top line and adds a clear profit‑margin target that many sell‑side models had not yet captured.
- Market reaction: The stock has been trading in a tight range (~US$9.80‑$10.30) on relatively low volume. The upside‑biased guidance, combined with the dividend uplift, should reduce the discount to its FY‑2025 valuation (currently ≈ 12 % below the implied 2025 EV/Rev multiple of 5.5×).
- Technical view: The price is holding above the 200‑day moving average (~US$9.75) and has recently bounced off a key support level at US$9.80. A breakout above the US$10.10 resistance—the midpoint of the recent consolidation—could trigger a short‑term rally, while a move below US$9.70 would test the lower trend‑line and could open the door to a corrective swing.
Trading implications
- Bullish case: If the market prices in the higher‑than‑expected Q3 and FY guidance, a long position with a target near US$10.30‑$10.50 (the next resistance cluster) is justified, especially on a breakout of the 200‑day MA.
- Bearish/neutral case: If investors remain skeptical about the AI‑credit execution or macro‑headwinds in China, the stock could stay range‑bound; in that scenario, a tight‑spread straddle (buying a call at US$10.10 and a put at US$9.80) would capture upside while limiting downside.
Overall, Qfin’s guidance is slightly ahead of consensus, bolstered by a dividend commitment, and should act as a catalyst for a modest upside move, provided the broader Chinese credit‑tech environment remains supportive.
Other Questions About This News
How did Qfin Holdings' Q2 2025 revenue and earnings compare to the same quarter last year and to consensus estimates?
What were the key drivers behind any revenue growth or decline in the second quarter?
How does the raised semi-annual dividend compare to the previous payout and to industry peers?
Did the company disclose any changes in its balance sheet strength, such as loan loss provisions or capital ratios?
How did the AI-empowered Credit-Tech platform performance impact margins and profitability?
What is the outlook for loan origination volume and credit risk in the upcoming quarters?
Are there any regulatory or macroeconomic risks highlighted that could affect the credit‑tech business in China?
How does Qfin's valuation metrics (P/E, EV/EBITDA) after the earnings release compare to its main competitors?
How sensitive is the stock price likely to be to any forward‑looking statements or uncertainties noted in the unaudited results?
What impact might the earnings results and dividend raise have on institutional ownership and short‑interest levels?
Did the company announce any strategic initiatives, partnerships, or product launches that could drive future growth?