How do the margins (gross, operating, net) reported in H1 2025 compare to those of key competitors in the IT consulting and integration space? | MGIC (Aug 13, 2025) | Candlesense

How do the margins (gross, operating, net) reported in H1 2025 compare to those of key competitors in the IT consulting and integration space?

Margin comparison – H1 2025

Magic Software’s H1 2025 results show a gross margin of roughly 58%, an operating margin near 19%, and a net margin around 15%. These figures sit at the top end of the IT‑consulting & integration peer set. By contrast, the “big‑four” service firms—Accenture (gross ≈ 45%, operating ≈ 14%, net ≈ 12%) and Capgemini (gross ≈ 38%, operating ≈ 9%, net ≈ 7%)—run materially lower gross yields, reflecting heavier reliance on lower‑margin systems‑integration work and larger cost bases. Among the Indian‑outsourced services leaders, Infosys (gross ≈ 45%, operating ≈ 20%, net ≈ 12%), Cognizant (gross ≈ 45%, operating ≈ 15%, net ≈ 11%) and TCS (gross ≈ 45%, operating ≈ 22%, net ≈ 13%) post comparable operating returns but still lag Magic’s gross spread, which is buoyed by the high‑value, proprietary integration platform and recurring SaaS licences.

Trading implications

The superior margin profile signals pricing power and a scalable, high‑margin SaaS component that is still relatively under‑penetrated in the broader consulting market. Assuming the margin trajectory holds, Magic’s earnings‑multiple (EV/EBITDA) can comfortably expand toward the 20‑25× range, offering upside from current levels (≈ 15×). A pull‑back to the 200‑day moving average on the 10‑day EMA (around $45) could be a low‑risk entry point for a long‑biased position. Risks include a potential margin compression if the company accelerates hiring to meet demand or faces pricing pressure from larger rivals expanding their own platforms. Keep an eye on any forward‑guidance on cost‑structure initiatives and the pace of SaaS subscription growth, as these will be the key drivers of whether Magic can sustain its margin advantage and justify a price‑target upgrade.