Did Magic Software provide any revised guidance for FY2025 or FY2026, and what are the implications for valuation? | MGIC (Aug 13, 2025) | Candlesense

Did Magic Software provide any revised guidance for FY2025 or FY2026, and what are the implications for valuation?

Guidance Update:

The press‑release summarizing Magic Software’s Q2 2025 and first‑half results does not contain any revised FY 2025 or FY 2026 revenue or profit guidance. The company merely presented the latest earnings numbers and did not amend its previously issued outlook for FY 2025 (or provide a new FY 2026 target).

Valuation Implications:

Because management has not updated its forward‑looking numbers, the market’s current valuation remains anchored to the prior FY 2025 guidance that was in place before the quarter‑end release. In practice, this means:

  • Fundamentals: The lack of new guidance signals that the company does not see a material deviation—positive or negative—from its current FY 2025 trajectory. Analysts will therefore continue to apply the existing forward‑price‑to‑sales (P/S) and forward‑price‑to‑earnings (P/E) multiples based on the last guidance, adjusting only for the Q2 earnings surprise (if any) and the updated half‑year numbers.

  • Technical/Market Reaction: The stock’s price action will largely reflect the earnings beat/miss and any accompanying commentary on margins, cash‑flow, or order backlog. In the absence of a guidance shift, any price movement is likely driven by short‑term sentiment rather than a fundamental re‑rating. Traders should watch the immediate price reaction for potential over‑/under‑reactions and consider a short‑term swing based on technical support/resistance levels, while keeping a longer‑term position tied to the unchanged FY 2025 outlook.

Actionable Insight:

With guidance unchanged, the prudent trade is to stay flat or employ a tight‑range strategy until the company releases its FY 2025/2026 guidance in the next quarterly report or at the FY 2025 full‑year earnings call. If the Q2 results were materially above expectations, a short‑term “buy on pull‑back” could be justified, but the underlying valuation remains anchored to the prior FY‑2025 expectations, so any long‑term position should remain weighted by the existing FY 2025 valuation multiples.