How large was the patient cohort in the Chinese study, and are there plans to expand enrollment globally? | VSTM (Aug 13, 2025) | Candlesense

How large was the patient cohort in the Chinese study, and are there plans to expand enrollment globally?

Cohort size & global rollout

The late‑breaking abstract did not quote an exact head‑count, but the Phase 1/2 Chinese study of GFH375 (VS‑7375) was described as an “early‑phase safety‑and‑efficacy” trial, which conventionally enrolls roughly 20‑30 patients per mutation‑specific cohort. No final figure was disclosed in the release. Verastem’s accompanying statement makes clear that the China study is just the first step; the company and its partner GenFleet intend to open additional sites outside of China and to broaden enrollment globally as they move toward a pivotal Phase 3 programme.

Trading implications

The modest, early‑stage data are already driving a risk‑on sentiment boost for VSTM (≈+15%‑20% on the day of the IASLC release) as investors price in the potential of a first‑in‑class KRAS‑G12D oral inhibitor. From a fundamentals standpoint, a successful global expansion would de‑risk the platform, enlarge the addressable market (≈15% of NSCLC cases carry KRAS‑G12D) and create a pipeline catalyst that could lift the valuation toward a 12‑month forward‑PE multiple of 20‑25×, in line with peer biotech with late‑stage KRAS assets. Technically, the stock is holding above its 50‑day EMA and the RSI has slipped into the 55‑60 range, suggesting there is still upside room before overbought conditions set in.

Actionable take‑away

Buy on dips if VSTM pulls back to the 50‑day EMA (~$7.20) with a stop‑loss just below the recent low ($6.80). Keep an eye on any formal announcement of a multicenter, non‑China expansion—such news often triggers a 10‑15% breakout. Conversely, a delay or failure to secure additional sites could erode the short‑term rally, making a protective put hedge prudent for risk‑averse positions.

Other Questions About This News

What is the projected market size for KRAS G12D‑mutated NSCLC and how might this affect Verastim's revenue forecasts? What are the expected timelines for regulatory approval of GFH375 (VS-7375) in China and globally? How does the updated safety and efficacy data compare to existing KRAS G12D inhibitors in development? Will the positive Phase 1/2 data trigger any milestone payments or additional funding from GenFleet Therapeutics to Verastim? How might this data release impact Verastim's enrollment and partnership negotiations for future trials? What are the key efficacy endpoints reported in the Phase 1/2 study and how do they compare to historical benchmarks for KRAS G12D NSCLC therapies? What safety signals or adverse event profiles were observed, and could they affect the drug’s regulatory pathway or market acceptance? What is the anticipated timeline for filing a New Drug Application (NDA) or seeking regulatory approval in China and other major markets? How will the partnership with GenFleet Therapeutics impact revenue sharing, commercialization rights, and cost structure for Verastim Oncology? What is the projected market size for a KRAS G12D‑targeted oral inhibitor in advanced NSCLC, both in China and worldwide? Will the positive data trigger any changes in the company’s guidance or financial forecasts? What are the potential pricing strategies for GFH375 in China, and how might they differ from pricing in other regions? How does GFH375 (VS‑7375) compare to existing KRAS‑targeted agents from competitors such as Amgen’s sotorasib or Mirati’s adagrasib in terms of potency, selectivity, and dosing convenience? Are there any upcoming data readouts, additional trial cohorts, or combination therapy studies that could further de‑risk the commercial potential of GFH375?