How does the potential combination of TBS-2025 with a menin inhibitor compare to existing therapies for relapsed/refractory AML in terms of efficacy and safety? | TUH (Aug 14, 2025) | Candlesense

How does the potential combination of TBS-2025 with a menin inhibitor compare to existing therapies for relapsed/refractory AML in terms of efficacy and safety?

Efficacy & Safety Outlook – The TBS‑2025/VISTA‑blocking antibody paired with a menin inhibitor targets two distinct AML‑driving pathways: immune checkpoint‑mediated evasion and the epigenetic transcription program that sustains NPM1‑mutated blasts. Early‑stage pre‑clinical data suggest synergistic induction of apoptosis and differentiation, potentially translating into deeper complete‑remission (CR) rates and higher minimal‑residual‑disease (MRD) negativity than the current standard of care (e.g., venetoclax + azacitidine or FLT3/IDH‑targeted agents). Because neither VISTA nor menin inhibition is represented in existing regimens, the combo could fill a clear therapeutic gap for relapsed/refractory (R/R) NPM1‑mutated AML, where response durability remains modest. Safety‑wise, VISTA mAbs have shown a relatively benign immune‑related profile (mostly mild rash, fatigue) in other indications, while menin inhibitors have reported manageable cytopenias and transient transaminase elevations. The overlap in myelosuppression is the primary concern; however, dose‑staggering and careful monitoring could keep Grade ≄ 3 events comparable to, or even below, those seen with intensive salvage chemotherapy.

Trading Implications – The announcement positions TuHURA (TUH) as a potential first‑in‑class player in a high‑unmet‑need niche, which should attract both specialty‑biotech investors and larger AML‑focused funds. The stock’s Q2 sentiment score (35) and recent acquisition news have already lifted momentum, but the real catalyst will be the 2H‑2025 Phase 2 read‑out. A positive CR/CRi signal with an acceptable safety slate could catalyze a 20‑30% upside, especially if data are presented at a major oncology conference or lead to a Fast‑Track designation. Conversely, any safety red flags or marginal efficacy could trigger a sharp correction, given the early‑stage nature of the program. From a technical standpoint, TUH is trading near its 200‑day moving average with moderate volume; a break above the recent high coupled with a bullish MACD crossover would be a trigger to add on dips (≈ 5‑10% pull‑backs). Risk‑managed exposure—e.g., a 10% position with a stop just below the 200‑day MA—offers upside potential while limiting downside if the Phase 2 data disappoint. Keep a close eye on competitor updates (e.g., new venetoclax combos) and regulatory milestones, as they will shape relative valuation and the risk‑reward profile for TUH.