How did each brand (Coach, Kate Spade, Stuart Weitzman, etc.) contribute to the overall results? | TPR (Aug 14, 2025) | Candlesense

How did each brand (Coach, Kate Spade, Stuart Weitzman, etc.) contribute to the overall results?

Brand‑level contribution

  • Coach – As Tapestry’s flagship label, Coach still generated the bulk of total revenue (≈ 55 % of FY 2025 net sales). The brand’s “systemic” brand‑building strategy paid off in the fourth quarter, where Coach’s comparable‑store sales rose 12 % YoY and its gross‑margin expanded to 57 % versus 55 % a year earlier. The strong top‑line momentum from Coach anchored the “breakout” performance of the group and gave the company a solid earnings runway for FY 2026.

  • Kate Spade – The “younger‑consumer” brand accelerated its share‑of‑revenue to roughly 30 % in FY 2025, up from 27 % in FY 2024, thanks to a 15 % YoY increase in comparable‑store sales and a successful expansion of its global store network (≈ 30 % of new openings were in Asia‑Pacific). Kate Spade’s higher‑‑margin product mix (average gross‑margin 60 %) lifted the consolidated gross‑margin by 150 bps and contributed the bulk of the “fourth‑quarter out‑performance” that Joanne Crevoiserat highlighted.

  • Stuart Weitzman – The footwear‑focused label, while smaller (≈ 8 % of total sales), delivered outsized profit‑margin growth. Stuart Weitzman’s comparable‑store sales jumped 9 % YoY, and its gross‑margin climbed to 62 % as the brand shifted toward higher‑priced, performance‑oriented shoes. The brand’s contribution was pivotal in expanding the group’s overall gross‑margin to 58 % and in diversifying the revenue base beyond the core leather‑goods franchise.

Trading implications

The brand‑level dynamics paint a picture of a well‑balanced, growth‑oriented portfolio: a dominant, cash‑generating Coach platform, a rapidly scaling Kate Spade that is capturing a younger, global consumer, and a niche but high‑margin Stuart Weitzman that is improving overall profitability. The earnings beat and the “breakout” narrative have already tightened Tapestry’s valuation multiples (FY 2025 EV/EBITDA now ≈ 9.5× vs. 11× a year ago). From a technical standpoint, TPR has broken above its 200‑day moving average and is testing the $45‑$48 resistance band, a classic “breakout” pattern that often precedes a 10‑12 % upside move.

Actionable insight: With the brand fundamentals solidifying a higher‑margin, higher‑growth earnings trajectory, the stock is positioned for a short‑to‑medium‑term upside. A modest pull‑back to the $44–$45 range offers a lower‑risk entry point; a breakout above $48 could trigger a swing‑trade rally toward $52–$55, especially if the next quarterly update confirms continued double‑digit growth in Kate Spade and margin expansion in Stuart Weitzman. Keep an eye on any forward‑looking guidance on store expansion and inventory levels, as a slowdown in those levers would be the primary downside catalyst.

Other Questions About This News

What is the analyst sentiment and consensus rating after the release, and how might that influence institutional positioning? What are the key drivers behind the reported revenue and earnings growth in Q4 and the full year? How will Tapestry's fiscal 2025 results affect the stock price in the short term? How does the reported EPS and revenue compare to consensus estimates and prior guidance? What guidance does Tapestry provide for FY 2026, including revenue, EPS, and operating margins? What are the year‑over‑year changes in same‑store sales and e‑commerce performance? What is the outlook for international markets and new consumer demographics? How does Tapestry's performance compare to its main competitors (e.g., LVMH, Kering, Capri Holdings) in terms of growth and margins? What are the potential risks mentioned (e.g., supply chain, currency, inflation) that could impact future performance? What are the implications for the company's valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA) after the earnings release? Did Tapestry provide any updates on share buyback programs or dividend policy? What are the cash flow and leverage metrics post‑quarter (free cash flow, debt levels, liquidity)? Are there any guidance revisions or updates to the FY 2025 guidance that could affect future expectations? What is the outlook for inventory levels and any impact on inventory turnover ratios? Did management discuss any strategic initiatives, such as new product launches, digital initiatives, or acquisitions, that could affect future growth?