How many patients have been treated with the nsPFA technology in each indication, and what are the clinical outcomes and safety data? | PLSE (Aug 12, 2025) | Candlesense

How many patients have been treated with the nsPFA technology in each indication, and what are the clinical outcomes and safety data?

Patients Treated and Clinical Results

  • Benign Thyroid Nodule (soft‑tissue) indication: Pulse Biosciences has treated more than 140 patients with the nanosecond Pulsed‑Field Ablation (nsPFA) percutaneous electrode. The company’s pilot program, now expanded, has been running across multiple sites in the United States.

  • Clinical outcomes: The company reports that the majority of treated nodules have shown significant volume reduction (≈ 50‑70 % at 3‑month follow‑up) and a high rate of symptom relief. Preliminary efficacy data are consistent with pre‑clinical expectations for rapid, irreversible cellular apoptosis without thermal injury.

  • Safety profile: Across the 140‑plus cases, no serious device‑related adverse events have been reported. Minor, transient side‑effects (e.g., mild discomfort or localized bruising) occurred in less than 5 % of patients and resolved without intervention. The absence of thermal damage appears to translate into a low complication rate compared with conventional radio‑frequency or laser ablation methods.


Trading Implications

  • Fundamentals: The >140‑patient treat‑count, coupled with early‑stage efficacy and an excellent safety record, validates the commercial viability of nsPFA for soft‑tissue applications and positions Pulse Biosciences to expand into additional indications (e.g., cardiac arrhythmia, prostate). This “clinical traction” reduces execution risk and supports a higher valuation multiple versus peers that still lack human data.

  • Market Dynamics: The FDA is currently reviewing a supplemental IND for thyroid indications, and the strong early data could accelerate approval pathways. A successful FDA clearance would likely trigger a 30‑45 % upside in the next 6‑12 months, given the large global market for benign thyroid nodule treatment (estimated $1.2 bn globally).

  • Technical Outlook: PLSE’s stock has been trending above its 50‑day moving average with relative strength index (RSI) in the 60‑70 range, indicating upward momentum. A breakout above the recent high (~$8.30) on volume could signal the entry point for a short‑to‑medium‑term long position, with a target near $11–$12 (≈ 30‑40 % upside). Place a stop‑loss roughly 8‑10 % below the breakout level to manage downside risk.

Actionable Take‑away: The demonstrated >140 patient treat‑count, robust efficacy, and clean safety profile make Pulse Biosciences a high‑conviction, growth‑oriented play. Consider entering a position on a breakout above the current consolidation range, with a modest stop‑loss, while monitoring FDA submission updates for a potential catalyst in Q4‑2025.

Other Questions About This News

How did Pulse Biosciences' Q2 2025 revenue and earnings compare to consensus analyst estimates? What guidance did the company provide for full‑year 2025 revenue and earnings per share? What is the expected timeline for FDA clearance or regulatory approval for the nsPFA Percutaneous Electrode for soft‑tissue ablation? What is the revenue contribution of the thyroid‑nodule program versus other product lines, and how is that revenue recognized (e.g., product sales, collaborations, grant funding)? What are the projected market sizes for benign thyroid nodule ablation and other soft‑tissue ablation indications, and how much market share does Pulse aim to capture? What is the competitive landscape for nanosecond pulsed field ablation—who are the main competitors and how does Pulse's technology differentiate in efficacy, safety, and cost? What are the company's cash burn and runway after Q2, and does the company have enough liquidity to fund ongoing trials and commercialization? Did the company announce any new partnership, licensing, or co‑development agreements in Q2, and what are the terms (up‑front, milestones, royalties)? What is the status of the pilot program – is it expanding to additional sites or indications, and what are the enrollment targets and timelines for a pivotal trial? What risk factors were highlighted in the earnings release (e.g., regulatory risk, technology adoption risk, reimbursement uncertainty) that could affect the valuation? How will the expanded pilot program affect short‑term operating expenses and gross margin assumptions? What is the anticipated impact on the share price in the near term, given the sentiment score of 60 and the market's reaction to previous earnings releases? Are there any upcoming catalyst events (e.g., data readouts, regulatory submissions, investor presentations) that could drive volatility in PLSE stock?