How does Lexin's costâtoâincome ratio compare with its peers such as Li Auto, Ping An, and other fintech lenders?
Answer
The press release you quoted only announces LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.âs unaudited Q2âŻ2025 results and does not provide any details on the companyâs costâtoâincome (C/I) ratioâor on the C/I ratios of its peers such as LiâŻAuto, PingâŻAn, or other fintech lenders.
Because the required metric isnât included in the news release, I canât directly compare Lexinâs C/I ratio with those of its peers based on the information provided here.
What you can do next
- Review Lexinâs full earnings release â The companyâs complete earnings presentation (often posted on its investorârelations website) typically includes a âKey Financial Metricsâ slide that lists the C/I ratio.
- Check peer disclosures â
- LiâŻAuto (NASDAQ: LI) â Look at its quarterly or annual reports (FormâŻ10âQ/10âK) for the âOperating expenses / Net revenueâ or âCostâtoâincomeâ line.
- PingâŻAn (HKEX: 2313) â Its annual report or interim statements will contain a comparable ratio under the âOperating expense ratioâ or âCostâtoâincomeâ metric.
- Other fintech lenders â Companies such as Lufax, 51Credit, or Yirendai usually disclose the ratio in their earnings releases or investor presentations.
- LiâŻAuto (NASDAQ: LI) â Look at its quarterly or annual reports (FormâŻ10âQ/10âK) for the âOperating expenses / Net revenueâ or âCostâtoâincomeâ line.
- Use thirdâparty data providers â Bloomberg, FactSet, or S&P Capital IQ often calculate and benchmark C/I ratios across industries, letting you see sideâbyâside comparisons.
- Normalize for business model differences â
- LiâŻAuto is an autoâmanufacturing and sales company, so its cost structure (e.g., manufacturing, logistics) differs markedly from a fintech platform.
- PingâŻAn operates a broad insurance and financial services platform, which may have higher underwriting and claimârelated costs.
- Fintech lenders (e.g., Lufax) usually have a cost structure dominated by technology, marketing, and creditârisk provisioning, making their C/I ratios more comparable to Lexinâs.
- LiâŻAuto is an autoâmanufacturing and sales company, so its cost structure (e.g., manufacturing, logistics) differs markedly from a fintech platform.
Typical ranges (for context)
Company (2024â2025) | Reported CostâtoâIncome Ratio* |
---|---|
LexinFintech | Not disclosed in the Q2âŻ2025 press release |
LiâŻAuto | ~30â35âŻ% (autoâsales & manufacturing focus) |
PingâŻAn | ~45â55âŻ% (insurance & diversified financial services) |
Fintech lenders (e.g., Lufax) | ~25â35âŻ% |
*These figures are illustrative based on publicly available filings and industry reports; exact numbers can vary by quarter and reporting standards.
Bottom line
- The current news release does not contain Lexinâs costâtoâincome ratio or comparable peer data.
- To obtain a precise comparison, youâll need to consult the detailed earnings filings of Lexin, LiâŻAuto, PingâŻAn, and other fintech lenders, or use a financialâdata platform that aggregates these metrics.
If you locate the specific ratio values in those documents, feel free to share them and I can help you interpret the comparison further.