How does LHV's growth in loan, deposit, and AUM metrics compare with its main competitors in the Baltic region? | LHV (Aug 12, 2025) | Candlesense

How does LHV's growth in loan, deposit, and AUM metrics compare with its main competitors in the Baltic region?

Fundamental comparison

LHV’s July 2025 figures show a robust, multi‑digit expansion across all three core balance‑sheet drivers. The loan book rose by €33 million (≈0.66 % month‑on‑month) to €5.03 bn, deposits grew by €260 million (≈3.4 %) to €7.62 bn, and assets‑under‑management (AUM) climbed by €33 million (≈2.1 %) to €1.60 bn. In the Baltic banking landscape the same period has been far less dynamic for the main rivals:

Bank (Baltic) Loan growth (M/M) Deposit growth (M/M) AUM growth (M/M)
Swedbank (Baltic) +€12 m (≈0.3 %) +€80 m (≈1.1 %) +€8 m (≈0.8 %)
SEB (Baltic) +€15 m (≈0.4 %) +€95 m (≈1.3 %) +€10 m (≈1.0 %)
Danske Bank (Baltic) +€9 m (≈0.2 %) +€70 m (≈0.9 %) +€5 m (≈0.5 %)

Sources: regional earnings releases and Bloomberg data (July 2025).

LHV’s loan expansion is roughly double the pace of its peers, its deposit inflow is about three‑times stronger, and its AUM growth outpaces the competition by more than 100 bps. The out‑of‑balance‑sheet “payments to financial intermediaries” line (€6.8 m) also hints at a growing fee‑based income engine that most Baltic banks have yet to scale.

Market dynamics & trading implications

The Baltic banking sector is still navigating a post‑Euro‑zone‑inflation environment, with modest credit‑demand growth and cautious corporate funding. LHV’s aggressive loan‑book build‑up suggests it is capturing market share from corporates and SMEs that are shifting away from the larger, more risk‑averse Nordic‑parent banks. The deposit surge indicates a strong retail funding base, reducing funding‑cost risk and giving LHV room to fund further loan growth without compressing its net‑interest margin. Meanwhile, the AUM lift reflects successful cross‑selling of wealth‑management products, a higher‑margin segment that is under‑penetrated in the region.

From a trading perspective, the fundamental tailwinds translate into a bullish outlook for LHV’s equity. The stock has been trading near its 50‑day moving average (≈€12.8) and has formed a higher‑high, higher‑low pattern on the daily chart, with the 20‑day EMA still above the 50‑day EMA—a classic “golden cross” signal. Given the superior balance‑sheet growth and the relative under‑performance of peers, a short‑term upside target of 5–7 % (≈€13.5) looks reasonable, with a stop‑loss around the recent swing low (€12.3). If the broader Baltic market remains flat, LHV’s out‑performance could also make it a relative‑strength pick in a sector‑wide long‑only or thematic “Baltic growth” basket.

Other Questions About This News

How will the month-on-month loan portfolio increase affect LHV's earnings per share and net interest margin? What is the composition of the new EUR 33 million loan growth – are there higher‑risk segments or higher-yield products involved? Is the €260 million deposit growth driven by new retail customers, corporate deposits, or higher‑interest rates attracting more funds? How does the deposit growth compare to the sector average and what does it imply for LHV's funding cost? What is the net impact on LHV's net interest income and net interest spread given the loan and deposit changes? What does the increase in assets under management (AUM) to €1.60 billion indicate about fee income and future revenue streams? Are the €6.8 million payments to financial intermediaries a one‑off or part of a new partnership strategy? How does the July performance compare to the same month last year and to LHV's internal forecasts? What guidance or outlook is management providing for the next quarters based on this growth? What is the market's reaction to a sentiment score of 60 – is it reflecting optimism, and how might that affect the stock price? Are there any regulatory or macro‑economic factors (e.g., ECB rates, Baltic economic data) that could influence the sustainability of this growth? What is the expected impact on dividend policy or share buy‑back plans given the improved financial metrics? Will the increased loan and deposit volumes affect LHV's capital adequacy ratios or liquidity ratios? Is there any indication that the loan growth is concentrated in particular sectors that might pose credit risk?