How does Invesco’s current AUM level compare with its main competitors in the asset‑management space?
Fundamental comparison
Invesco’s preliminary month‑end AUM of $2.02 trillion (July 31, 2025) places it well behind the “big‑three” global managers. As of the same date the industry leaders reported roughly:
Manager | Approx. AUM (Q3 2025) |
---|---|
BlackRock | $10.0 trn |
Vanguard | $8.3 trn |
State Street | $4.2 trn |
Fidelity (private) | $3.5 trn |
Invesco | $2.0 trn |
Thus, Invesco sits in the fourth‑to‑fifth tier of the market‑cap hierarchy—about 20‑30 % of the size of the nearest public peer (State Street) and ≈10 % of the top two houses. The firm’s 1.2 % month‑over‑month AUM growth and net inflows of $5.8 bn show it is still expanding, but the scale gap means it is more sensitive to relative outflows and fee‑compression pressures than the larger, more diversified rivals.
Trading implications
- Relative valuation edge: Because Invesco trades on a much smaller asset base, its earnings are more tightly linked to AUM trends. The recent inflow streak could translate into a short‑term earnings bump that the market may under‑price relative to peers—potentially a buy‑on‑dip if the stock’s price‑to‑earnings multiple is below the sector average.
- Risk considerations: The modest AUM size also implies higher volatility to client redemptions, especially in a tightening credit environment. A sustained outflow scenario would compress fee income faster than for BlackRock or Vanguard, so a stop‑loss around 5‑7 % downside from current levels would be prudent.
- Positioning: For a portfolio seeking exposure to mid‑cap asset‑management, Invesco offers growth upside with less market‑cap drag than the mega‑managers. A moderate long position (10‑15 % of the sector allocation) can capture the upside from AUM growth while keeping risk limited if the sector faces a broader pull‑back.
Other Questions About This News
How will the 1.2% month‑over‑month AUM growth affect Invesco’s share price in the short term?
What does the $5.8 billion net long‑term inflow indicate about investor sentiment toward Invesco’s product lineup?
What portion of the inflows came from new client acquisition versus existing client growth?
Will the reported non‑management fee structure change impact the firm’s net revenue and profit margins?
How sustainable is the AUM growth rate—does it reflect a one‑off event or a continuing trend?
What impact could the AUM increase have on Invesco’s expense‑ratio outlook and guidance for the next quarters?
Are there any macro‑economic or market‑wide factors that could amplify or offset the effect of this AUM growth on the stock?
What are the potential implications for Invesco’s capital allocation plans, such as share buybacks or dividend policy?