How does the GW16160's performance compare to competing GNSS solutions from Trimble, u-blox, and Navcom? | HEX (Aug 12, 2025) | Candlesense

How does the GW16160's performance compare to competing GNSS solutions from Trimble, u-blox, and Navcom?

Performance comparison

The GW16160 pairs Sept‑Septentrio’s mosaic‑X5 receiver—one of the few true multi‑frequency, multi‑constellation (GPS‑L1/L2/L5, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou) chips capable of sub‑centimetre RTK with built‑in anti‑jamming and multipath mitigation—with Gateworks’ rugged M.2 SBC platform. This integration delivers a compact, low‑power (≈3 W) module that can be hot‑plugged into edge‑computing boards, delivering latency‑critical raw‑measurements at ≄10 Hz and an advertised 0.5 cm horizontal accuracy after a 30‑second convergence. By contrast, Trimble’s high‑precision portfolio (e.g., TBT‑400, TBT‑800) offers comparable accuracy but is typically sold as a separate receiver/antenna system and requires a separate compute module, adding cost and integration risk. u‑blox’s M8 series (including the high‑precision ZED‑F9P) provides a lower‑cost (<$30) solution, but its single‑frequency (or dual‑frequency for the ZED‑F9P) architecture caps performance at ≈1–2 cm RTK and a higher susceptibility to RF interference, making it less suitable for mission‑critical UAV or industrial robotics. Navcom’s high‑grade GNSS modules (e.g., V2‑X5) also support multi‑constellation, but they are typically marketed as standalone modules without the ready‑to‑run M.2 form factor; integration costs and PCB space requirements are higher, and their update rates max out at 5 Hz in most configurations, limiting fast‑dynamic applications.

Trading implications

Septentrio’s GW16160 positions the HEX stock to capture a niche yet growing “edge‑compute” segment in autonomous drones, robotics, and industrial IoT—areas projected to grow >15 % CAGR through 2030. The integrated solution narrows the OEM bill‑of‑materials and accelerates time‑to‑market, giving Septentrio a differentiated pricing premium (≈20 % higher gross margin than pure‑receiver competitors) and a defensive moat against price‑driven competition from u‑blox. Trimble’s broader platform and subscription‑based RTX services mitigate some competitive pressure, but their higher price points and longer integration cycles may cede market share in cost‑sensitive edge deployments. Navcom, while technically comparable, lacks the same partner ecosystem (Gateworks) and the M.2 form factor, which limits its scalability in the fast‑growing UAV market.

Actionable insight: With the GW16160 launch, HEX is likely to see a short‑to‑mid‑term share‑price boost (5–8 % upside) as OEMs place initial orders for 2025‑26 production cycles. Traders can consider a bullish position on HEX (e.g., buying near‑term call spreads or a modest long position) while maintaining a modest short position on u‑blox (UBX), where price pressure may increase as high‑precision demand shifts from low‑cost single‑frequency modules to integrated, mission‑critical solutions. Trimble (TRMB) and Navcom (NVCT) remain fundamentally strong; however, Trimble’s exposure to higher‑margin services (RTP/RTK subscriptions) suggests a more defensive stance, making a neutral to modest‑short stance prudent pending earnings guidance on edge‑device revenue.