What new geological or exploration data were included in the May 29 2025 report that were not in the May 16 2025 release? | GOH (Aug 07, 2025) | Candlesense
GOH

What new geological or exploration data were included in the May 29 2025 report that were not in the May 16 2025 release?

Answer

Based on the information you’ve provided, the news release only announces that GoldHaven Resources Corp. has re‑filed an independent technical report for its Copeçal Project (effective May 29 2025) and references the earlier release dated May 16 2025. The announcement does not specify which geological or exploration data were added or changed in the May 29 2025 version compared with the May 16 2025 release.

Therefore, with the current excerpt we cannot identify the new data items that were included in the May 29 2025 report and absent from the May 16 2025 release. To obtain a detailed, item‑by‑item comparison you would need to:

  1. Access the full technical reports:

    • The May 29 2025 technical report is available on GoldHaven’s SEDAR+ profile (www.sedarplus.ca) and on the company’s website (link provided in the release).
    • The May 16 2025 release (or the earlier version of the technical report) should also be archived on SEDAR or the company’s website.

  2. Perform a side‑by‑side review of the two documents, focusing on sections that typically contain new geological or exploration information, such as:

    • Geology & Mineralization (e.g., updated lithology models, new structural interpretations, expanded mineral‑resource estimates).
    • Exploration Results (e.g., additional drill‑hole data, assay results, geophysical surveys, or sampling campaigns conducted after May 16 2025).
    • Resource & Reserve Updates (e.g., revised tonnage/grade figures, changes in cut‑off grades, or inclusion of inferred resources that were previously omitted).
    • Project Modifications (e.g., revised project boundaries, updated pit designs, or new infrastructure plans).

  3. Check any “Changes Since Last Report” or “Updates” sections that the NI 43‑101 technical report format often includes. These sections explicitly list new data, revisions, or corrections made since the prior filing.

If you need a precise list of the new geological or exploration data, the most reliable approach is to download both versions of the technical report and compare their contents directly. Should you obtain those documents and share specific excerpts or tables, I can help you extract and summarize the differences.

Other Questions About This News

What is the expected timeline for the next major development milestones at Copeçal following this technical report? Will the refiling trigger any changes in analyst coverage or target price revisions for GOH? What are the potential upside or downside scenarios based on the technical report’s findings? How will the refiling of the NI 43‑101 technical report affect GoldHaven's current valuation and share price? How might the refiling influence market perception of GoldHaven's management credibility and execution capability? Does the updated technical report contain any changes to the resource or reserve estimates for the Copeçal Project? How does the Copeçal project's updated metrics compare to similar gold projects in Brazil and globally? Are there any revised capital or operating cost assumptions that could impact the project's economics? Is there any indication of potential partnership, joint‑venture, or financing activity linked to the Copeçal Project in the new report?