Are there any revised capital or operating cost assumptions that could impact the project's economics? | GOH (Aug 07, 2025) | Candlesense
GOH

Are there any revised capital or operating cost assumptions that could impact the project's economics?

Short answer:

The news release does not mention any changes to capital‑ or operating‑cost assumptions for the Copeçal Gold Project. It only announces that an independent NI 43‑101 technical report has been re‑filed (effective May 29 2025). Therefore, based on the information provided, there is no indication that revised cost assumptions have been introduced that could affect the project’s economics.

Why the answer is limited to “no”

What the release says What that means for cost assumptions
“GoldHaven Resources Corp. … is pleased to announce … the refiling of an independent technical report for its Copeçal Project prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43‑101.” The focus is on the re‑filing of the technical report itself, not on any updates or revisions to the model, assumptions, or economics.
“The technical report, titled ‘Technical Report on the Geology, Mineralization and Exploration of the Copeçal Gold Project, Mato Grosso State, Northwestern Brazil’ and with an effective date of May 29 2025 can be found on the Company’s SEDAR+ profile …” The report is now available for public review, but the press release does not summarize its contents. Any changes to capital or operating cost assumptions would be detailed inside the report, not in the brief announcement.
No mention of “revised cost assumptions,” “updated capital cost,” “operating cost,” “cash‑flow model,” or “economic sensitivity” In the absence of explicit language, we cannot infer that such revisions exist.

What you can do next

  1. Access the full technical report – The report is posted on GoldHaven’s SEDAR+ profile (www.sedarplus.ca) and on the company’s website. The “Economic Evaluation” or “Pre‑Feasibility/Feasibility” sections of the report will list the capital‑cost (CAPEX) and operating‑cost (OPEX) assumptions used in the financial model, together with any sensitivity analyses.
  2. Check for “Updates” or “Revisions” – Look for a “Changes Since Last Report” or “Updates to the Model” table, which is a standard part of NI 43‑101 technical reports. If the company has altered cost assumptions, those changes will be documented there.
  3. Compare with the May 16 2025 release – The earlier news release (May 16 2025) may have referenced the original technical report. By comparing the two reports you can identify any differences in cost assumptions, drilling budgets, processing plant design, or other economic inputs.
  4. Contact Investor Relations – If you need a quick confirmation, GoldHaven’s Investor Relations team can be asked whether any cost assumptions were revised in the May 29 2025 technical report. Their contact details are typically listed on the company’s website or in the SEDAR filing.

Bottom line:

Based solely on the August 7 2025 news announcement, there is no explicit information about revised capital or operating cost assumptions that could affect the Copeçal project’s economics. To determine whether any such revisions exist—and to assess their potential impact—you’ll need to review the full technical report that was re‑filed on May 29 2025.

Other Questions About This News

Will the refiling trigger any changes in analyst coverage or target price revisions for GOH? What are the potential upside or downside scenarios based on the technical report’s findings? How will the refiling of the NI 43‑101 technical report affect GoldHaven's current valuation and share price? How might the refiling influence market perception of GoldHaven's management credibility and execution capability? Does the updated technical report contain any changes to the resource or reserve estimates for the Copeçal Project? How does the Copeçal project's updated metrics compare to similar gold projects in Brazil and globally? Is there any indication of potential partnership, joint‑venture, or financing activity linked to the Copeçal Project in the new report? What new geological or exploration data were included in the May 29 2025 report that were not in the May 16 2025 release? What is the expected timeline for the next major development milestones at Copeçal following this technical report?