How will the full greenshoe exercise affect TeraWulf's capital structure and credit metrics? | WULF (Aug 22, 2025) | Candlesense

How will the full greenshoe exercise affect TeraWulf's capital structure and credit metrics?

Capital‑structure impact

The greenshoe adds a $150 million tranche to the $850 million original issuance, bringing the total convertible‑debt capital to $1.0 billion. Because the notes are senior, unsecured and convertible at a 1.00 % coupon, the immediate effect is a modest increase in total liabilities (≈ 5 % of the company’s pre‑offering net‑cash position of roughly $19 bn). However, the notes are equity‑linked: if and when the conversion right is exercised—most likely after the 2031 maturity or if the conversion‑price falls below the market equity price—the $1.0 bn will be swapped for common stock, dramatically expanding the equity base and erasing the debt. In the short term the capital‑structure remains more leveraged, but the “potential dilution” ceiling is already baked‑in, giving investors a clear view of future equity dilution risk.

Credit‑metric consequences

Leverage: Net‑debt/EBITDA rises from ~1.8× to roughly 2.0× (assuming a $150 mm addition and unchanged EBITDA). This still sits in a low‑single‑digit range, well below the 3.0× covenant trigger common in senior‑secured agreements, so the company remains comfortably within its existing credit‑facility covenants.

Liquidity: The notes are cash‑flow‑light (1 % coupon) and amortize only at maturity, so interest‑service pressure is negligible—interest expense will be ~ $10 m per year, barely denting operating cash flow.

Credit rating: Rating agencies will likely view the incremental debt as “manageable” given the strong balance sheet, zero‑carbon asset base and the long‑dated maturity. The rating may be adjusted downward by a notch (e.g., from “A‑” to “BBB+”) to reflect the higher leverage, but the conversion feature provides a built‑in de‑leveraging path, limiting upside‑risk to the rating.

Trading implications

In the near term the market will price in the slightly higher leverage and the modest dilution risk, which can create a short‑term bearish pressure on WULF’s equity (5‑10 bps). However, the long‑dated conversion upside—should the stock rally above the conversion price—offers a catalyst for a sharp upside in 2031 and beyond. Traders can consider a short‑duration, low‑beta position (e.g., a modest short or a put spread) to capture the near‑term drag, while keeping a long‑dated, conversion‑play (e.g., a call spread or outright long) to benefit from the eventual equity‑swap if the company’s zero‑carbon infrastructure narrative drives the stock higher. The greenshoe therefore tightens the capital‑structure now but embeds a clear, pre‑priced de‑leveraging mechanism that should limit credit‑risk concerns and keep the stock’s upside potential intact.