What the news tells us
- The Business Wire release titled âWatts Water Technologies Reports Record Second Quarter 2025 Resultsâ (publishedâŻ2025â08â06) notes that Watts Water Technologies (tickerâŻWTS) posted a record Q2âŻ2025.
- The headline language (ârecord second quarterâ) strongly implies that revenue (and likely other key metrics such as earnings per share) grew yearâoverâyear and/or beat analystsâ expectations.
- However, the excerpt you provided does not contain any specific figures â there is no disclosed revenue amount, percentage growth, or guidance for the quarter, nor any mention of how that growth stacks up against peers.
What we would need to make a proper comparison
| Data point | Why it matters | Typical source |
|---|---|---|
| Watts Water Technologies Q2âŻ2025 revenue (actual dollar amount and YoY % change) | Establishes the baseline for comparison. | Wattsâ FormâŻ8âQ, earnings press release, investor presentation. |
| Revenue growth rates of the main competitors (e.g., Xylem Inc.âŻ(XLY), IDEX Corp.âŻ(IEX), Mueller Water ProductsâŻ(MWPM), etc.) for their Q2âŻ2025 (or the most recent comparable quarter) | Allows sideâbyâside benchmarking of performance. | Competitorsâ 8âQ filings, earnings releases, Bloomberg/FactSet data. |
| Marketâshare context (e.g., size of the waterâinfrastructure market, segmentâspecific growth trends) | Helps interpret whether a ârecordâ quarter reflects marketâwide expansion or companyâspecific outperformance. | Industry research reports (e.g., Global Water Infrastructure Outlook, IBISWorld). |
| Analyst expectations vs. actual results (both for Watts and peers) | Shows if growth beat consensus expectations, a common gauge of relative performance. | Consensus estimates from FactSet, Refinitiv, or sellâside research. |
Why a direct answer isnât possible from the provided news
- No quantitative revenue figure: Without the actual Q2âŻ2025 revenue or the percent change, we canât calculate the growth rate.
- No competitor data: The release does not list any performance metrics for Wattsâ peers, nor does it reference industry benchmarks.
- No context for ârecordâ: âRecordâ could refer to total revenue, net income, margin expansion, or a nonâfinancial milestone; the excerpt does not clarify.
What you can do next
Locate Watts Water Technologiesâ full earnings release (usually available on the companyâs Investor Relations website or via the SEC EDGAR database). Look for the âConsolidated Statements of Operationsâ and the Management Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) section, where they will state:
- Revenue for Q2âŻ2025
- YoY (and QoQ) growth percentages
- Commentary on drivers of growth (e.g., product mix, pricing, volume).
Gather the same quarterâs results for the main competitors. Typical peers in the waterâinfrastructure space include:
- Xylem Inc. (XLY)
- IDEX Corp. (IEX)
- Mueller Water Products (MWPM)
- Pentair plc (PNR)
- American Water Works (AWK)
Pull their Q2âŻ2025 (or latest) revenue figures from their 8âQ filings or press releases.
- Create a comparison table similar to the one below (once you have the numbers):
| Company | Q2âŻ2025 Revenue | YoY Growth % | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Watts Water Technologies (WTS) | $XâŻB | +YâŻ% | Record quarter, driven by Z |
| Xylem (XLY) | $AâŻB | +BâŻ% | Strong demand in ... |
| IDEX (IEX) | $CâŻB | +DâŻ% | ... |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
- Interpret the results:
- If Wattsâ YoY growth > peers, it suggests outperformance.
- If Wattsâ growth is similar to or below peers, the ârecordâ label may be more about absolute scale rather than relative speed.
- Consider external factors (e.g., regional waterâinfrastructure investment cycles, inflationary pricing, supplyâchain constraints) that could affect all players.
Bottom line
Based solely on the snippet you shared, we can only say that Watts Water Technologies achieved a ârecordâ second quarter in 2025, indicating positive revenue growth. We cannot quantify that growth or compare it to its competitors without additional financial data from Wattsâ complete earnings release and the comparable quarter results of its peers. To perform a thorough comparative analysis, retrieve the detailed figures outlined above and then evaluate the relative performance.