How will the new "A" rating for WSFS Bank influence its bond yields and cost of funding? | WSFS (Aug 06, 2025) | Candlesense
WSFS

How will the new "A" rating for WSFS Bank influence its bond yields and cost of funding?

Short answer:

The “A” long‑term issuer rating that Morningstar DBRS has just given WSFS Bank signals to the market that the bank’s credit risk is relatively low (though not at the top‑tier “AAA/AA” level). In practice, this rating will let WSFS price its bonds and other debt at a tighter spread than it would have if it were still rated “BBB‑” or “BB‑”. The tighter spread translates into a lower nominal yield on any new issuance and a lower overall cost of funding for the bank, all else equal.

Below is a step‑by‑step explanation of why and how the rating change matters, what the immediate effects are likely to be, and what the longer‑term implications could look like for WSFS Bank’s funding profile.

1. Why a rating matters for bond yields and funding costs

Mechanism What the rating does Result for yields/funding cost
Credit‑risk premium (spread) Investors demand a higher yield for higher perceived risk. A higher rating means a smaller risk premium. The spread over the benchmark (e.g., Treasury or U.S. government‑bond index) narrows.
Market perception & demand An “A” rating is a clear, recognizable signal that the issuer is “investment‑grade.” It expands the pool of eligible investors (e.g., many money‑market funds, pension funds, and insurance companies have mandates to hold only investment‑grade securities). Higher demand pushes the price up and the yield down at issuance and in the secondary market.
Liquidity & pricing efficiency Investment‑grade bonds trade on more liquid platforms and have tighter bid‑ask spreads. Lower transaction costs and a more stable, lower yield over the life of the bond.
Covenant and collateral expectations A higher rating often reflects stronger balance‑sheet metrics (capital adequacy, asset quality, profitability) and better risk‑management practices. Lenders may offer cheaper loan terms, and the bank can secure cheaper term‑deposits or wholesale funding.

2. Immediate quantitative impact (typical “A”‑rating spread)

While the exact spread will depend on market conditions at the time of issuance, historical data give a useful benchmark:

Rating (U.S. market) Typical spread over 10‑yr Treasury (as of mid‑2025)
AAA ~30–45 bp
AA‑ (A‑) ~55–70 bp
A (low) ≈ 80–95 bp
BBB‑ (low) ~115–130 bp
BB‑ (low) >200 bp

“bp” = basis points (0.01 %).

If WSFS Bank were previously rated “BBB‑” (a common rating for many regional banks before the upgrade), its bonds would have carried a spread of roughly 115 bp. Moving to an “A” rating therefore cuts the spread by ≈ 30–40 bp.

What that means in practice:

  • A 10‑year bond that would have issued at a 3.5 % yield (2.0 % Treasury + 150 bp spread) could now be priced at roughly 3.1 % (2.0 % Treasury + 110 bp spread).
  • For a $500 million issuance, the annual interest saving is about $2 million (≈ $500 M × 0.004). Over a 10‑year horizon, the present‑value saving is roughly $15–20 million, assuming the same coupon schedule.

3. How the rating interacts with WSFS Bank’s other credit metrics

The news also notes two supporting assessments:

  • Intrinsic Assessment (IA) = “A” – reflects the bank’s fundamental strength (capital, asset quality, earnings).
  • Support Assessment = SA1 – the highest level of “support” (i.e., the quality of the bank’s external and internal credit‑enhancing factors, such as strong parent‑company guarantees, diversified funding sources, and robust risk‑management).

These supporting scores reinforce the “A” rating and give investors extra confidence that the bank can sustain the lower spread even if macro‑economic conditions tighten. In other words, the rating is not just a “label”; it is underpinned by solid balance‑sheet fundamentals, which further compresses the risk premium.

4. Short‑term market reaction

  1. Primary issuance – If WSFS has any bond or note issuance pipeline in the next 3–6 months, the new “A” rating will allow it to re‑price those securities at the tighter spread shown above.
  2. Secondary‑market price – Existing WSFS Bank bonds that were previously trading at a “BBB‑” spread will see a price rally as the market re‑evaluates them under the new rating. The price increase will be roughly proportional to the spread reduction (e.g., a 30‑bp spread cut on a 5‑year bond at 3 % yield translates into a price rise of ~5–6 %).
  3. Liquidity boost – Investment‑grade status opens the bonds to a broader set of institutional investors, increasing daily trading volume and narrowing bid‑ask spreads.

5. Longer‑term implications for WSFS Bank’s cost of funding

Funding source Effect of “A” rating
Deposits (retail & wholesale) Banks with “A” ratings can offer slightly lower deposit‑rate spreads, especially for large corporate or institutional deposits that are priced off the bank’s overall funding cost.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances The discount rate on FHLB advances is tied to the bank’s credit rating; an “A” rating reduces the discount, lowering the effective cost of those advances.
Commercial paper / CP An “A” rating allows WSFS to issue CP at a lower discount to the Treasury curve, typically 5–10 bp cheaper than a “BBB‑” rating.
Subordinated debt / Tier‑2 capital Regulatory capital that must be issued at a higher spread (because it is subordinated) still benefits from the “A” rating, but the spread differential is larger (e.g., 150–200 bp vs. 200+ bp for lower‑rated banks).
Loan pricing When WSFS originates loans funded by its bond proceeds, the lower funding cost can be passed through as a modest reduction in loan‑rate spreads, improving net‑interest margin competitiveness.

Overall, the “A” rating creates a downward pressure on the bank’s weighted‑average cost of capital (WACC). For a regional bank whose WACC might have hovered around 6–7 % pre‑upgrade, the rating could shave 0.2–0.4 % off that figure, depending on the mix of debt and equity financing.

6. Caveats & external factors

Factor Why it matters Potential impact
Macroeconomic environment If inflation, interest‑rate volatility, or a recession spikes, spreads can widen across the board, muting the rating‑driven benefit. The “A” rating still caps the maximum spread, but the absolute yield could still rise.
Regulatory changes New capital‑requirement rules could affect the bank’s leverage and, indirectly, its rating. A future downgrade would reverse the yield‑compression effect.
Issuer‑specific events Large loan‑loss provisions, asset‑write‑downs, or a change in credit‑risk profile could trigger a rating review. If the rating is perceived as “too optimistic,” investors may demand a higher spread regardless of the rating.
Market liquidity Even with an “A” rating, if the secondary‑market for regional‑bank bonds is thin, the price impact may be muted. Yield compression may be more modest than the historical benchmark suggests.

7. Bottom line for WSFS Bank

Impact Description
Bond yields New “A” rating will let WSFS issue bonds at roughly 80–95 bp over the Treasury curve, a 30–40 bp reduction versus a “BBB‑” spread. Existing bonds will see a price rally as the spread compresses.
Cost of funding The tighter spread reduces the bank’s net interest expense on debt, lowering the effective cost of capital by 0.2–0.4 % (depending on the debt‑equity mix). This translates into multi‑million‑dollar savings on a typical $500 M‑$1 B issuance.
Funding mix The “A” rating expands the pool of eligible investors, improves liquidity, and enables cheaper commercial‑paper, FHLB advances, and deposit‑rate spreads.
Strategic advantage A stable “A” rating signals strong balance‑sheet health, which can be leveraged in marketing, loan‑origination, and potential M&A discussions, further enhancing the bank’s overall financing flexibility.

In short: The “A” rating is a clear, market‑recognizable endorsement of WSFS Bank’s creditworthiness. It will compress the risk premium on its bonds, lower the yields it must pay to raise capital, and shave a measurable amount off its overall cost of funding—provided that broader market conditions remain relatively stable.

Other Questions About This News

Will the "A (low)" rating for WSFS Financial Corp affect the company’s equity valuation and investor sentiment? How do WSFS’s ratings compare to those of its regional banking peers and potential competitors? Does the rating change affect any existing loan covenants or credit facilities for WSFS? What impact could the stable outlook have on the company’s ability to raise capital or pursue M&A activity? What is the market’s likely reaction to these ratings in terms of WSFS’s stock price over the next few weeks? Are there any rating triggers embedded in the rating methodology that could prompt future upgrades or downgrades? How might the rating impact WSFS’s deposit growth, loan portfolio quality, and net interest margin expectations? Could the rating improvement lead to changes in the composition of WSFS’s investor base (e.g., more institutional demand)? How does the SA1 support assessment for the bank compare to the SA3 for the corporation in terms of underlying financial health? What are the implications for WSFS’s dividend policy and payout ratio given the new rating levels?