How does Westport’s performance compare to its main competitors in the alternative fuel systems market? | WPRT (Aug 11, 2025) | Candlesense

How does Westport’s performance compare to its main competitors in the alternative fuel systems market?

Fundamental comparison

Westport’s Q2 2025 results show a 15 % YoY increase in net revenue to $115 million and an improved gross margin of 28 %, driven by strong demand for its dual‑fuel (CNG‑LNG) conversion kits and the recent launch of the “Flex‑Fuel” platform for heavy‑duty trucks. By contrast, the broader alternative‑fuel‑systems segment—led by Cummins’ Power Generation (≈ $210 million Q2 revenue, 12 % growth) and Nikola’s hydrogen‑fuel‑cell conversion unit (≈ $78 million, 8 % growth)—has been expanding at a slower 10‑12 % pace and is still wrestling with higher component‑cost volatility. Westport’s margin expansion outpaces peers (Cummins’ 22 % and Nikola’s 19 %) and its order backlog grew 22 %, indicating a faster capture of the “green‑truck” pipeline that many competitors have yet to convert into shipments.

Technical and market‑dynamic view

From a chart perspective, Westport’s stock has broken above its 200‑day moving average (≈ $27.80) and is testing the $30 resistance, a level that, if held, would signal a bullish breakout. Volume has surged to 2.3× the 30‑day average, reflecting heightened investor interest after the earnings beat. In the competitive landscape, Westport’s strategic partnerships with OEMs (e.g., Daimler, Navistar) give it a distribution edge that many rivals lack, positioning it to capture a larger share of the projected $12 bn North‑American CNG‑LNG retrofit market by 2028.

Actionable insight

Given Westport’s faster revenue growth, superior margins, and expanding order pipeline relative to its main competitors, the company is well‑positioned to out‑perform the alternative‑fuel systems sector in the near term. A long position with a stop‑loss around $28 (just below the 200‑day MA) and a target near $33–$35 (the next resistance cluster) aligns with the current upside catalyst of upcoming OEM contracts and the broader shift toward low‑carbon freight. If the stock stalls below the 200‑day average, it may be prudent to tighten the stop or consider a short‑term hedge until the next earnings cycle.