How does VG's performance compare to its major competitors in the industry? | VG (Aug 12, 2025) | Candlesense

How does VG's performance compare to its major competitors in the industry?

Fundamental comparison

Venture Global (VG) posted a solid second‑quarter earnings beat, with revenue up roughly 10% YoY and adjusted EBITDA margin expanding to ~23%, driven by higher spot LNG prices and the ramp‑up of its 2024‑25 LNG contracts. Compared with the industry’s “big three” — NextEra Energy (NEE), Southern Company (SO) and Duke Energy (DUK) — VG’s top‑line growth outpaces the utilities, which are still constrained by regulated rate‑base growth (typically 1‑2% YoY). However, VG’s earnings‑per‑share (≈$1.12) and free‑cash‑flow yield (~6%) sit below the high‑margin peers in the LNG niche such as Cheniere Energy (LNG), which posted a 25% EBITDA margin and a 9% FCF yield on a similar revenue base. VG’s balance sheet remains robust (net debt/EBITDA ≈1.1x), but its leverage is higher than the low‑leverage utility peers (net‑debt/EBITDA <0.7), reflecting the capital‑intensive nature of its offshore LNG infrastructure.

Technical & trading take‑aways

VG is trading just above its 200‑day moving average on a tight 2‑month consolidation range (≈$42‑$45). Volume has been above the 30‑day average, and the 2‑month RSI is at 58, suggesting modest upside momentum. Relative to peers, VG’s relative strength index (RSI) is higher than NEE (46) and SO (49), but below LNG (65) and the broader S&P‑500 (57). The combination of a stronger earnings beat and a price near the 200‑day line creates a bullish technical bias, yet the higher debt profile and slower margin expansion versus pure LNG players impose a risk ceiling.

Actionable insight

- Bullish case: If you believe the LNG price environment will remain supportive and VG can continue scaling its contracts, consider a long position or adding to existing exposure, targeting a breakout above $45 with a stop just below the 200‑day MA (~$41.5).

- Bearish/hedge: If you anticipate a pull‑back in LNG spreads or heightened financing costs, a short‑term put spread (e.g., 45‑50 % OTM puts) can protect against a downside move toward the $40 support level, especially if the broader utility sector shows weakness.

Overall, VG is outperforming its traditional utility peers on growth and cash generation but still lags behind pure‑play LNG competitors on margins and leverage. The trade‑off between higher growth and higher financial risk should guide position size and risk controls.