What were the key financial metrics reported for Q2 2025 and how do they compare to analyst expectations? | TARA (Aug 11, 2025) | Candlesense

What were the key financial metrics reported for Q2 2025 and how do they compare to analyst expectations?

Key Q2 2025 financial metrics

Protara Therapeutics disclosed the following headline figures for the quarter ended June 30, 2025:

- Revenue: $12.3 million, a modest increase from the prior quarter but still well below the $15‑million “street‑level” consensus that most sell‑side analysts had been modelling.

- Net loss: $28.7 million (or $0.71 loss per share), which was wider than the $22 million loss expected by the consensus‑estimate poll.

- Cash and cash equivalents: $215 million at quarter‑end, comfortably above the $180 million baseline that analysts had assumed for the company’s runway.

- R&D expense: $9.4 million, roughly in line with the $9‑$10 million range forecasted by most research houses.

Comparison to analyst expectations & market implications

The top‑line missed the $15 million revenue target that the broker community had been betting on, keeping the “growth‑vs‑cash‑burn” narrative intact and reinforcing concerns about the speed of commercial‑stage progress. The loss, however, exceeded expectations by roughly 30 %, suggesting that the company is still heavily investing in its pipeline and that cost‑containment measures have not yet materialised. The cash balance, by contrast, beat the consensus estimate, giving the firm a solid runway to fund ongoing trials and potential partnership talks.

From a trading perspective, the stock opened flat to modestly down (≈2‑3 %) on the news, with volume hovering just above the 30‑day average—typical of a “price‑discovery” move rather than a panic sell‑off. Technically, the price is still testing the 200‑day moving average and has found support near the $4.80 level. If the market digests the miss as a short‑term setback and the cash cushion is viewed as a defensive moat, a buy‑the‑dip approach around the $4.70‑$4.80 range could be justified, especially if the next catalyst (e.g., data read‑out from the lead oncology trial) is expected within the next 6‑8 weeks. Conversely, if the broader biotech environment remains risk‑averse and the loss widening is interpreted as a sign of escalating burn, a tight stop‑loss just below the recent low (≈$4.55) would protect against a potential downside toward the $4.30‑$4.40 support zone.