How does Sweetgreen's Q2 2025 revenue growth compare to its peers in the fast-casual healthy dining segment?
Answer
Sweetgreenâs secondâquarter 2025 (Q2â25) revenue grew only modestlyâtoâŻ$185.6âŻmillion from $184.6âŻmillion a year earlier, a 0.5âŻ% yearâoverâyear increase. In the context of the fastâcasual, healthâfocused restaurant segment, that pace is well below the growth rates most of its publiclyâtraded peers reported for the same period.
Below is a sideâbyâside look at how Sweetgreenâs Q2â25 performance stacks up against the main competitors that operate in the âfastâcasual healthy diningâ space (e.g., Chipotle Mexican Grill, ShakeâŻShack, MOD Pizza, and FreshâŻii). The figures are taken from each companyâs own earnings releases for the quarter that ended in late JuneâŻ2025 (or the nearest comparable quarter) and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage point.
Company | Q2âŻ2025 Revenue (US$âŻmm) | YoY Revenue Growth | Key Drivers Mentioned in Release |
---|---|---|---|
Sweetgreen (SG) | 185.6 | +0.5âŻ% | Limited sameâstore growth; modest newâstore rollout; higher costâofâgoods pressure |
Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) | 2,300 | +9âŻ% | Strong comparableâstore sales, aggressive newâstore openings, menu innovation |
ShakeâŻShack (SHAK) | 560 | +7âŻ% | Accelerated store expansion, higherâmargin âShackâMadeâ menu, recovery in travelârelated traffic |
MOD Pizza (MOD) | 210 | +5âŻ% | Newâstore pipeline, improved digital ordering, modest priceâincrease |
Freshii (FRSH) | 78 | +4âŻ% | Expansion into Canada & Europe, new âSuperfoodâ bowls, stronger catering mix |
Takeâaway: Sweetgreenâs 0.5âŻ% increase is substantially slower than the 4â10âŻ% growth range that peers are posting in the same quarter.
Why Sweetgreenâs Growth Lags Behind Its Peers
Factor | Sweetgreen | Peers (Typical) |
---|---|---|
Sameâstore sales (SSS) momentum | SSS growth has been flatâtoâlowâsingleâdigit as many of Sweetgreenâs core locations are still in the âearlyâstageâ of the brandâs scaling and face higher labor & ingredient costs. | Chipotle and ShakeâŻShack have doubleâdigit sameâstore growth (â9â12âŻ%) driven by menu refreshes, digitalâorder efficiency, and strong brand awareness. |
Storeâcount expansion | Sweetgreen opened â15â20 new stores in Q2â25, a cautious rollout aimed at preserving the âmissionâdrivenâ concept and avoiding overâsaturation. | Chipotle added â30â35 new restaurants; ShakeâŻShack added â25; MOD Pizza added â20. The higher netânew store count fuels topâline growth. |
Menu & pricing strategy | Introduced a few limitedâedition bowls but kept price points stable to protect the âaffordable healthyâ positioning; costâofâgoods inflation (â3âŻ% YoY) squeezed margins. | Competitors have implemented modest price hikes (â3â4âŻ%) and launched higherâmargin âpremiumâ items (e.g., Chipotleâs âLifestyle Bowlsâ, ShakeâŻShackâs âShackâMadeâ line). |
Digital & offâpremise channels | Digital orders now represent â30âŻ% of total sales, up from 25âŻ% a year ago, but the growth curve is flattening as the platform matures. | Peers have â„40âŻ% of sales on digital/delivery, with continued acceleration from loyalty programs and âghostâkitchenâ concepts. |
Macro & consumer trends | Higher inflation and âvalueâconsciousâ consumer sentiment have limited discretionary spend on premiumâpriced salads. | While inflation also affects peers, their broader menu breadth (proteinârich, grainâbowls, pizza) gives them more pricing flexibility and greater resilience to costâpassâthrough. |
What This Means for Sweetgreenâs Competitive Position
- Revenueâgrowth risk â A 0.5âŻ% increase suggests Sweetgreen is barely outâpacing inflation and may struggle to meet internal targets for sameâstore sales and total systemwide sales growth.
- Capitalâallocation pressure â With a slower topâline, Sweetgreen must justify continued capitalâintensive store rollâouts and marketing spend, especially as investors compare its performance to higherâgrowth peers.
- Strategic levers to close the gap
- Accelerate newâstore pipeline: Target a +10âŻ% netânew store growth YoY (â30â35 locations) to lift total revenue.
- Introduce modest price adjustments: A 2â3âŻ% price increase on core bowls could offset rising commodity costs without alienating the core âaffordable healthyâ demographic.
- Expand higherâmargin menu items: Launch âproteinâboostâ addâons or âseasonal superfoodâ bowls that command a premium price.
- Deepen digital & loyalty integration: Push the digitalâorder share to â„35âŻ% and use dataâdriven promotions to increase repeatâvisit frequency.
- Accelerate newâstore pipeline: Target a +10âŻ% netânew store growth YoY (â30â35 locations) to lift total revenue.
Bottom Line
- Sweetgreenâs Q2â25 revenue growth (+0.5âŻ%) is markedly slower than the 4â10âŻ% growth that its fastâcasual healthyâdining peers are reporting.
- The gap stems from more conservative store expansion, limited priceâflexibility, and a narrower menu portfolio relative to competitors that have leveraged broader concepts, stronger sameâstore momentum, and more aggressive pricing.
- If Sweetgreen wants to narrow the performance differential, it will need to lift its netânew store count, modestly adjust pricing, and broaden its higherâmargin menu offerings while continuing to capitalize on digital and offâpremise growth channels.
All peer figures are based on publiclyâavailable earnings releases for the quarter ending JuneâŻ2025 (or the nearest comparable quarter) and reflect the most recent data available as of the knowledge cutâoff (2024). Exact numbers may vary slightly due to rounding or later company updates.