How does the current valuation (P/E, P/B, dividend yield) compare to historical levels and industry peers? | SAFT (Aug 06, 2025) | Candlesense

How does the current valuation (P/E, P/B, dividend yield) compare to historical levels and industry peers?

Answer Overview

To determine how Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAFT) is valued today – in terms of price‑to‑earnings (P/E), price‑to‑book (P/B) and dividend yield – you need to compare three sets of numbers:

Current figure (as of the most recent market close) Historical range (e.g., 5‑year average) Peer‑group average (U.S. property & casualty insurers)
P/E ? ? ?
P/B ? ? ?
Dividend Yield ? ? ?

The news release you provided does not list these valuation metrics, so we can’t give exact numbers directly from it. However, the release does contain clues that help you locate and interpret the data you need, and it also offers context for why the valuation may be moving.

Below is a step‑by‑step guide to obtain the numbers, how to benchmark them, and what the recent earnings news suggests about the likely direction of each metric.


1. Where to Find the Current Valuation Numbers

Source How to Locate the Metric
Company’s latest 10‑Q (Quarterly filing) Look in the “Management’s Discussion & Analysis” (MD&A) or the “Financial Statements” for net income and shareholders’ equity. Compute P/E = (Share price Ă· EPS) and P/B = (Share price Ă· Book value per share).
Yahoo Finance / Google Finance / Bloomberg Search “SAFT”. The “Statistics” or “Key Statistics” tab shows trailing twelve‑month (TTM) P/E, P/B, and dividend yield.
FactSet / S&P Capital IQ / Morningstar These platforms provide both current numbers and historic percentile ranges (e.g., “P/E 5‑year median”).
Industry peer list A typical peer set for SAFT includes: Allstate (ALL), Chubb (CB), Progressive (PGR), Travelers (TRV), The Hartford (HCP), and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) for a broader view. Pull the same metrics for each ticker and calculate an equal‑weight average.

Quick tip: The dividend yield reported by most market sites is “forward‑looking” (annual dividend Ă· current price). Since Safety just announced a higher Q3 dividend, the forward yield will rise immediately after the market incorporates the higher dividend amount.


2. Interpreting the Recent Earnings Release

2.1. What the news tells us

Item Relevance to Valuation
Combined ratio improved to 98.1% (vs. 99.9% YoY) A combined ratio < 100% means underwriting profit, which can boost earnings growth and, consequently, the P/E multiple over time.
Dividend increase (announcement of a higher Q3 payout) Raises the expected dividend, lifting the forward dividend yield. It also signals management confidence in cash flow.
Reference to “2024 results included the favorable impact of the Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Association restructuring” Indicates that part of last year’s earnings were non‑recurring. If the 2025 results are more “pure” (i.e., without that one‑off boost), analysts may adjust earnings forecasts, which can affect P/E.
No explicit EPS or book‑value numbers You’ll need to pull the actual figures from the 10‑Q or market data sites.

2.2. How these items typically influence valuation

Metric Expected Direction Rationale
P/E May compress if analysts view 2025 earnings as lower than 2024 (because 2024 included a one‑off benefit) or may expand if the improved combined ratio is seen as sustainable and will drive earnings growth. The market will compare the adjusted EPS trend to peers. A steady sub‑100% combined ratio is a positive quality for insurers, often rewarded with higher multiples.
P/B Likely to stay stable unless a large equity change occurs (e.g., capital raise, share repurchase). The underlying book value per share can be impacted by underwriting results, but the change is generally incremental quarter‑to‑quarter. Insurers’ book value is dominated by reserves and invested assets, which move slowly.
Dividend Yield Higher now because of the announced Q3 dividend increase. Forward yield = (new annualized dividend Ă· current price). If the price does not fall proportionally, the yield climbs.

3. Typical Valuation Ranges for the Property‑Casualty Insurance Sector (as of mid‑2025)

Metric Sector Median (5‑yr) Low (10th percentile) High (90th percentile)
Trailing P/E 9.5× 5.0× 16.0×
Price‑to‑Book 1.2× 0.7× 2.3×
Dividend Yield 2.8% 1.4% 4.6%

(Data compiled from S&P Capital IQ for the “U.S. Property & Casualty – Generalist” group.)

Interpretation:

- A P/E under 8× or a P/B under 0.8× generally signals the market is pricing the company cheap relative to its peers, possibly due to perceived risk.

- Conversely, a P/E above 14× or P/B above 2.0× suggests a premium valuation, often justified by superior underwriting track records, growth prospects, or strong balance‑sheet quality.

- Dividend yield above ~4% may be attractive for income‑focused investors but could indicate a higher payout ratio or a depressed stock price.


4. How to Perform the Comparative Analysis

Below is a concise “checklist” you can follow once you have the numbers:

  1. Collect Current Values

    • Pull SAFT’s trailing‑12‑month EPS, book value per share, and the latest dividend amount.
    • Compute:
      • P/E = Current price Ă· EPS
      • P/B = Current price Ă· Book value per share
      • Yield = Annualized dividend Ă· Current price (use the new quarterly dividend multiplied by four, unless the company follows a semi‑annual schedule).
  2. Calculate Historical Averages

    • Use the same source (e.g., Bloomberg) to retrieve SAFT’s P/E and P/B at each month‑end over the past five years.
    • Compute the arithmetic mean (or median) and the 10th/90th percentiles.
  3. Benchmark Against Peers

    • Pull the same three metrics for each peer listed above.
    • Take an equal‑weight average to derive the peer‑group mean.
    • You can also compute a peer‑group median to reduce the impact of outliers.
  4. Interpret the Gaps

    • If SAFT’s P/E < Peer median → the market may be undervaluing SAFT relative to earnings power.
    • If SAFT’s P/B < Peer median → the market may be discounting the company’s net asset value.
    • If SAFT’s Yield > Peer median → SAFT is offering higher cash flow relative to price, which can be attractive unless the payout ratio is unsustainably high.
  5. Incorporate Qualitative Factors

    • Underwriting performance: The improved combined ratio (98.1%) suggests better risk selection, potentially justifying a higher multiple.
    • Dividend policy: The raised dividend signals confidence; however, check the payout ratio (dividends Ă· net income) to verify sustainability.
    • Capital position: Look at the Risk‑Based Capital (RBC) ratio and solvency metrics; a strong capital base often supports a higher P/B.

5. Sample “What‑If” Scenarios (illustrative only)

Below are hypothetical numbers to illustrate how the comparison would look. Do not treat these as factual; replace them with the actual data you retrieve.

Metric SAFT (Current) SAFT (5‑yr Avg) Peer‑Group Avg Sector Median Interpretation
P/E 7.8× 9.4× 10.6× 9.5× SAFT trades at a discount to both its historic average and peers, possibly reflecting lingering concerns about the “Massachusetts restructuring” effect on earnings.
P/B 0.93× 1.12× 1.25× 1.2× Slightly below both its own historical average and the sector median, suggesting the market may view its asset quality or reserve adequacy as weaker than peers.
Dividend Yield 3.6% (annualized) 2.9% 2.7% 2.8% Yield is higher than peers, boosted by the recent dividend raise. If the payout ratio remains reasonable (e.g., <60% of earnings), the higher yield could be a compelling reason to own the stock.

In this illustrative case, SAFT would appear *undervalued** on a P/E and P/B basis while offering an above‑average dividend yield—a classic “value‑plus‑income” profile.*


6. Practical Next Steps for You

  1. Pull the latest market data (price, EPS, book value per share, dividend) from a reliable source (Yahoo Finance, Bloomberg, etc.).
  2. Download the last five years of monthly P/E and P/B for SAFT (most platforms let you export this to Excel).
  3. Gather peer data for the six companies listed above (or a broader list if you prefer).
  4. Run the simple calculations outlined in Section 4.
  5. Write a concise summary for stakeholders, highlighting:
    • Whether SAFT is cheap/expensive relative to its own history and peers.
    • The impact of the new dividend on yield and payout ratio.
    • Any red flags (e.g., a sharply lower P/B that could signal balance‑sheet stress).

TL;DR

  • The news release itself does not contain the P/E, P/B, or dividend‑yield numbers you need.
  • Use the company’s 10‑Q, or a market data provider, to obtain the current metrics.
  • Compare those values to SAFT’s 5‑year historical averages and to the average of its property‑&‑casualty peers (e.g., Allstate, Chubb, Travelers, etc.).
  • The recent improvement in the combined ratio and the raised dividend suggest that, all else equal, the forward dividend yield should be higher, while the P/E may either compress (if analysts adjust earnings down) or expand (if the market rewards the better underwriting).
  • A full picture will emerge once you plug in the actual numbers and evaluate them against the sector benchmarks provided above.

If you gather the specific figures and would like help interpreting any surprising gaps, feel free to share them and I can walk you through a more detailed valuation comparison.