Could the lawsuit trigger a credit rating downgrade or affect RxSight’s borrowing capacity? | RXST (Aug 12, 2025) | Candlesense

Could the lawsuit trigger a credit rating downgrade or affect RxSight’s borrowing capacity?

Credit‑rating impact – A class‑action suit of this size (Makaveev v. RxSight) does not, by itself, force a rating agency to cut a company’s credit rating. Agencies typically look for material cash‑flow or covenant breaches, not litigation exposure alone. However, the suit raises a legal‑risk flag that can prompt a “watch” or “negative outlook” upgrade if the case proceeds to a settlement that could materially affect RxSight’s balance sheet (e.g., a multi‑hundred‑million‑dollar payout). Until a judgment or settlement is announced, the probability of an immediate downgrade is low, but the “negative‑sentiment” rating (‑30) suggests the market is already pricing in a higher risk premium.

Borrowing capacity – RxSight’s existing credit facilities are likely tied to covenant‑based leverage ratios. Even without a rating downgrade, the mere existence of a pending class‑action can tighten lender discipline: banks may demand higher interest spreads, stricter covenants, or a reduction in available draw‑down amounts to protect against a potential large out‑of‑pocket liability. If the lawsuit escalates to a settlement that materially erodes cash or equity, the company’s leverage could breach existing covenants, automatically curtailing its borrowing line. In the short term, the market will view the litigation as a “off‑balance‑sheet” contingency, prompting a modest increase in the company’s cost of capital.

Trading implication – The current technical picture for RXST is still in a down‑trend (price below its 50‑day SMA, declining momentum on the MACD, and a bearish RSI hovering near 35). The added legal head‑line risk reinforces the downside bias. For risk‑averse traders, a short‑position or a protective stop‑loss around the recent low (≈ $4.80) is prudent. More aggressive traders could look for a break‑below the $4.50 support as a trigger for a deeper pull‑back, while a buy‑the‑dip on a clear bounce off the $5.00 level could be justified only if the company releases a settlement update that caps the liability and restores confidence in its cash‑flow outlook. In short, the lawsuit does not guarantee a rating downgrade now, but it does elevate credit‑risk perception and could constrain RxSight’s borrowing capacity if the case materialises into a sizable payout.