I’m sorry, but the excerpt you’ve shared doesn’t contain the specific data needed to evaluate Riley Permian’s profit margin or cost structure relative to other operators in the Permian Basin. The release mentions production figures (e.g., an average of 24.4 MMboe/d) but does not provide details on:
- Net income, earnings per share, or operating cash flow that would allow calculation of a profit margin.
- Operating costs (e.g., per‑barrel lifting costs, drilling expenses, overhead) that could be benchmarked against peers.
- Any comparative commentary or ratios that the company may have supplied to position itself relative to other Permian producers.
To make a meaningful comparison you would need additional information such as:
| Metric | Riley Permian (Q2 2025) | Typical Peer Range (Permian) |
|---|---|---|
| Net profit margin | – | 5‑15 % (varies by company) |
| Operating cost per boe | – | $10‑$15 /boe (lifting) |
| Capital efficiency (capex/boe) | – | $2‑$4 /boe |
| Cash flow conversion | – | 50‑80 % of earnings |
You can obtain these figures from Riley Permian’s full earnings release (usually includes income statement tables, cost per barrel breakdowns, and management commentary) or from financial databases that aggregate peer metrics (e.g., S&P Capital IQ, Bloomberg, or industry analyst reports).
If you can supply the detailed financial tables or any management discussion on costs and margins, I can then provide a more precise comparison to the company’s Permian peers.