What commodity price assumptions are embedded in the guidance and how sensitive are the results to oil and gas price fluctuations? | PRQ (Aug 07, 2025) | Candlesense

What commodity price assumptions are embedded in the guidance and how sensitive are the results to oil and gas price fluctuations?

Short answer: The excerpt you’ve provided does not contain the specific commodity‑price assumptions that Petr Resources used in its Q2‑2025 guidance, nor does it include the sensitivity analysis that would show how the results would change with different oil‑ or gas‑price scenarios.

Below is a concise explanation of what we can and cannot deduce from the information that has been shared, together with suggestions on where you can find the detailed figures you’re looking for.


1. What the news release actually tells us

Item Detail from the release
Company Petrus Resources Ltd. (TSX: PRQ)
Report period Three‑ and six‑month results ended June 30 2025
Source GlobeNewswire press release (August 7 2025)
Content The release announces that the company “is pleased to report financial and operating results” for the quarter and half‑year. No numerical financial data or guidance assumptions are quoted in the excerpt you have supplied.
What is missing • The price levels (e.g., WTI crude, Brent, natural‑gas, condensate, or any other commodity) used as inputs in the financial guidance.
• The sensitivity tables (e.g., “price‑sensitivity analysis”, “scenario analysis”, or “sensitivity to oil/gas price changes”) that many mining and energy companies normally attach as a foot‑note or a separate “Sensitivity to commodity price” table.
Implication Because the press‑release excerpt contains only a headline announcement, there is no publicly‑disclosed price assumption or sensitivity information to reference.

2. Why the missing information matters

  1. Commodity‑price assumptions are a core part of any oil‑and‑gas company’s guidance – they usually specify a base‑case price (e.g., $85 /bbl for crude oil, $3.20 /MMBtu for natural gas, $75 /bbl for condensate, etc.) that the company uses to convert production volumes into cash‑flow forecasts.

  2. Sensitivity analysis is a standard disclosure – it shows how a change (e.g., ±10 % in oil price or ±$0.50 in gas price) would affect key metrics such as net earnings, cash flow, net debt, and cash‑flow‑to‑debt ratios. Investors use this to gauge the volatility of the business and to assess the risk of a price‑driven downturn.

  3. Without those details – we cannot answer how the results would change if oil prices were 10 % higher or lower, or what the break‑even price is for the company’s operations.


3. How to find the exact price assumptions and sensitivity analysis

  1. Read the full press release – The complete GlobeNewswire announcement (often a PDF or HTML file) will typically contain:

    • A “Commodity price assumptions” table (or a paragraph in the “Management Discussion and Outlook” section).
    • A “Sensitivity” or “Scenario” table that presents the effect of a 10‑15 % change in oil/gas price on EBITDA, net earnings, cash flow, and/or cash‑flow‑to‑debt‑ratio.
  2. Check the Company’s Investor Relations site – The “Quarterly Results” page for the “Q2‑2025” release will usually have a PDF of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)” or “Financial Results – Q2 2025” document that contains the assumptions and the sensitivity tables.

  3. Look at the SEDAR filing – Canadian public‑company disclosures (e.g., Form 40‑F) are filed on SEDAR. The filing for the quarter (likely a Form 40‑F or a Quarterly Report) will list the price assumptions and a sensitivity analysis in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” section.

  4. Contact Investor Relations – If the document is not publicly posted, you can email the IR team (usually listed in the press release) and request a copy of the “Q2 2025 Guidance” sheet, which will contain the price assumptions.

  5. Look for supplementary presentations – Often the company will release a “Quarterly Investor Presentation” that includes a slide titled “Price Sensitivity” or “Commodity Price Assumptions”.


4. Typical commodity‑price assumptions used by similar Canadian oil‑and‑gas companies (for context)

Note: The following figures are *examples** of the type of assumptions that other companies in the sector have used in recent quarters. They are not taken from Petrus Resources’ release (the information isn’t available in the excerpt you provided).*

Commodity Typical base‑case price (often used for guidance)
WTI crude oil (U.S.) $80‑$85 /bbl
Brent crude (European) $85‑$90 /bbl
Natural gas (AECO) $2.80‑$3.20 /MMBtu
Condensate $45‑$55 /bbl
Natural‑gas liquids (NGL) $1.00‑$1.25 /bbl (NGL price per barrel of oil equivalent)

Typical sensitivity ranges (commonly disclosed in a “sensitivity” table):

Scenario Oil price ±10 % Gas price ±10 % Effect on Net Earnings (example)
Base case $85 /bbl WTI $3.00 /MMBtu
Oil +10 % $93.5 /bbl Net earnings may rise 15‑25 % depending on the proportion of oil in the revenue mix.
Oil −10 % $76.5 /bbl Net earnings may fall 12‑22 % (often the most sensitive metric).
Gas +10 % $3.30 /MMBtu Net earnings may increase 5‑10 % (if natural‑gas production is a sizable portion of revenue).
Combined Net earnings could swing ±30 % in a high‑oil/low‑gas scenario, or be relatively flat if the portfolio is heavily weighted to condensate.

Again, these figures are for illustration only and not derived from Petrus Resources’ actual guidance.


5. Bottom line

  • The specific commodity‑price assumptions and the sensitivity of Petrus Resources’ Q2‑2025 guidance to oil and gas price changes are not included in the excerpt you provided.
  • To obtain that information, you will need to consult the full Q2‑2025 earnings release, the associated MD&A or SEDAR filing, or the Investor‑Presentation that accompany the press release. Those documents normally contain a table listing the assumed prices for oil, gas, and related products, plus a “price‑sensitivity” analysis that quantifies how changes in those prices affect key financial metrics.

If you obtain the full release or a related PDF and share the relevant sections, I can give you a precise, numbers‑based answer and walk through the exact sensitivity impact (e.g., “a $5 /bbl increase in WTI would raise net earnings by X %”, “a $0.20/MMBtu drop in gas price would reduce cash flow by $Y million”, etc.). Feel free to paste the relevant excerpt or let me know if you need guidance on how to locate the full filing.

Other Questions About This News

Did the Company announce any significant acquisitions, asset sales, or joint‑venture agreements that could affect future earnings? How does the company's ESG and sustainability profile impact investor perception and financing costs? How does the company's valuation (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/NAV) look after the reported results compared to peers and industry averages? Is there any update on regulatory approvals, environmental permits, or potential legal liabilities that could impact operations? Is there guidance for Q3 2025 and FY2025, and how does it compare to analyst consensus and the Company’s own prior guidance? What are the changes in cost metrics (e.g., cash netback, operating cash cost, lift‑costs) and how do they compare with industry benchmarks? What are the changes in production volumes (oil, natural gas, liquids) versus guidance and peers? What are the potential short‑term technical factors (e.g., market sentiment, analyst upgrades/downgrades, insider buying) that could influence the stock price? What is the current share structure (outstanding shares, share purchases, or potential dilution from stock‑based compensation) and does it affect valuation? What was the cash flow situation (operating cash flow, free cash flow) and how does it affect the company’s ability to fund capital projects or dividends? What were the key drivers behind the Q2 2025 earnings surprise (if any) and how sustainable are they? How did capital expenditures this quarter compare to the Company’s budget and to prior quarters? Did management provide any commentary on market conditions, competitive positioning, or strategic initiatives? How did revenue and net earnings compare to the same quarter last year and to the previous quarter? What is the current debt level and debt‑to‑equity ratio, and are there any upcoming debt maturities or covenant issues?