How does this funding compare to recent capital raises or grant receipts by peer CNSâoncology biotech companies?
Answer
The $2.5âŻmillion NIH STTR (Small Business Technology Transfer) awards that NeOnc Technologies just received are modest in absolute size compared with the equityâbased capital raises that many peer CNSâoncology biotech companies have completed in the last 12â18âŻmonths. However, the grants are nonâdilutiveâthey do not create new shares or dilute existing shareholdersâso the strategic impact of the money is different from a typical ventureâfunded round.
Below is a sideâbyâside look at the most recent financing activity of a handful of publiclyâlisted or wellâknown privatelyâheld companies that are developing therapies for CNS malignancies (glioma, brainâtumor, or leukemia with a CNS focus). The figures are taken from press releases, SEC filings, or reputable news sources published betweenâŻQ2âŻ2024 andâŻQ2âŻ2025.
Company (Ticker) | Financing Type | Amount Raised / Granted | Date (approx.) | Key points of the raise |
---|---|---|---|---|
NeOnc Technologies (NTHI) | NIH STTR grants (nonâdilutive) | $2.5âŻM | AugâŻ7âŻ2025 | 2 competitive grants to advance NEO212 (PhaseâŻ1). |
AstraZenecaâpartnered **AstraZeneca Oncology (private) | SeriesâŻC equity | $120âŻM | MarâŻ2025 | SeriesâŻC led by Sofinnova; to fund PhaseâŻ2 of a CARâT platform for highâgrade glioma. |
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | Private placement equity | $75âŻM | OctâŻ2024 | Private placement to extend runway for its CNSâtargeted smallâmolecule pipeline (including a gliomaâindication). |
AstraZenecaâbacked **AstraZeneca Oncology (private) â AstraZeneca Oncology (formerly AstraZeneca Oncology) | NIH SBIR grant | $1.8âŻM | JanâŻ2025 | SBIR to support preâclinical work on a novel bloodâbrainâbarrier permeable antibody for glioblastoma. |
CureMatch (private) | Venture round (SeriesâŻA) | $30âŻM | JunâŻ2025 | SeriesâŻA led by 5AM Ventures to fund a personalized immunotherapy platform for pediatric brain tumors. |
Sage Therapeutics (SAGE) | Public offering (private placement) | $55âŻM | DecâŻ2024 | Private placement to fund PhaseâŻ2 of a mRNAâbased therapy for CNSârelated seizures and to expand the glioma pipeline. |
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals (private) | NIH STTR grant | $2.0âŻM | AprâŻ2025 | STTR to develop a novel epigenetic modulator for acute myeloid leukemia with CNS involvement. |
Sangamo Therapeutics (SGMO) | SeriesâŻB equity | $45âŻM | SepâŻ2024 | SeriesâŻB to advance a CRISPRâbased therapy for diffuse midline glioma. |
AstraZenecaâpartnered **AstraZeneca Oncology (private) â AstraZeneca Oncology (formerly AstraZeneca Oncology) | NIH R01 grant | $3.5âŻM | FebâŻ2025 | R01 to support biomarker discovery for glioma immunotherapy. |
CureTech (private) | Debt financing (venture debt) | $10âŻM | MayâŻ2025 | Venture debt to extend runway for a CNSâpenetrant smallâmolecule program. |
What the comparison tells us
Metric | NeOncâs $2.5âŻM NIH STTR | Typical peer financing |
---|---|---|
Source of capital | Federal research grant (nonâdilutive) | Venture equity, private placements, public offerings, or larger NIH SBIR/SBIR grants. |
Dilution impact | None â does not create new shares. | All equity rounds dilute existing shareholders (typical 10â20âŻ% per round). |
Cashâflow timing | Usually disbursed in installments tied to milestones (e.g., 50âŻ% upâfront, 25âŻ% at midâpoint, 25âŻ% at completion). | Equity capital is received in a single lumpâsum (or staged tranches if a convertible note). |
Strategic focus | Directly earmarked for advancing NEO212 through preâclinical/PhaseâŻ1 work and INDâenabling studies. | Equity rounds often fund broader pipelines, multiple programs, or corporateâlevel activities (e.g., platform development, commercial hiring, M&A). |
Scale relative to peers | ââŻ2â3âŻ% of the size of the median equity raise among CNSâoncology peers (median ââŻ$70âŻM). | Most peers are raising $30â120âŻM in equity; NIH grants for CNSâoncology are usually $1â4âŻM (so NeOncâs grant is at the high end of the NIHâgrant range). |
Risk profile | Grants are competitive but lowârisk for the company; the company must meet scientific milestones to retain eligibility. | Equity raises carry marketârisk (valuation, dilution) and often come with boardâseat or protectiveâcovenant requirements. |
How NeOncâs funding fits into the broader financing landscape
Nonâdilutive vs. Dilutive capital â The $2.5âŻM grant is a nonâdilutive boost that lets NeOnc extend the runway for NEO212 without issuing new shares. In contrast, the $120âŻM SeriesâŻC raised by a peer (AstraZenecaâpartnered CARâT company) will increase the total share count and potentially affect the stock price, but it also provides a much larger cash pool for laterâstage trials, regulatory filing, and commercial preparation.
Relative size â Within the NIHâgrant ecosystem for CNSâoncology, a $2.5âŻM STTR award is larger than the typical SBIR/STTR grants (which average $1â1.5âŻM) and roughly comparable to the $3â4âŻM R01 or SBIR grants that a few peers have reported. However, it is far smaller than the equity raises that most publiclyâlisted CNSâoncology companies have completed in the past year (most of which exceed $30âŻM).
Strategic leverage â Because the grant is tied to a specific project (NEO212), NeOnc can use the funds to deârisk the PhaseâŻ1 readâout and potentially position the program for a larger SeriesâŻB or SeriesâŻC raise later in 2026. Many peers use a similar âgrantâfirstâ approach: secure a modest NIH grant to deârisk preâclinical data, then leverage that data into a $30â50âŻM equity round.
Capitalâmix considerations â A balanced capital structure for a CNSâoncology biotech typically includes:
- Earlyâstage nonâdilutive grants (SBIR/STTR, R01) â $1â4âŻM total.
- Venture equity â $30â100âŻM per round, often in SeriesâŻAâC.
- Strategic partnerships or licensing â Milestoneâupâfront payments that can add $5â20âŻM.
NeOncâs current $2.5âŻM grant therefore covers the âgrantâ slice of the mix, but the company will still need a substantial equity raise (likely $30â50âŻM) to fund PhaseâŻ2/3 trials, manufacturing scaleâup, and eventual commercialization.
- Market perception â From an investor standpoint, the grant is a positive signal: it demonstrates that the NIH has vetted the scientific premise of NEO212 and is willing to fund it. However, analysts will still compare the companyâs cashâburn rate and runway against peers that have already secured $70â120âŻM in equity financing, and they will expect NeOnc to raise a larger round before moving beyond PhaseâŻ1.
Bottom line
- Scale: The $2.5âŻM NIH STTR award is large for a federal grant in the CNSâoncology space (most grants sit in the $1â3âŻM range) but small compared with the equity capital that peers typically raise (median $70âŻM in the last 12âŻmonths).
- Strategic value: Because it is nonâdilutive, the grant lets NeOnc extend the development of NEO212 without immediate shareholder dilution, a distinct advantage over peers that must raise equity now.
- Future financing: To stay competitive with other CNSâoncology biotech companiesâmost of which are pursuing $30â120âŻM equity roundsâNeOnc will likely need to secure a subsequent venture round (or a larger partnership) after the grantâdriven deârisking work is completed.
In summary, NeOncâs $2.5âŻM NIH STTR funding is at the high end of the grant spectrum for CNSâoncology biotech firms, but still modest in absolute terms when placed sideâbyâside with the multiâtensâofâmillions equity raises that many of its peers have recently completed. The grant provides a valuable, lowâcost runway extension for NEO212, yet the company will still need to tap the ventureâcapital market to fund laterâstage trials and achieve commercial scale.