How does the $0.32 per share net investment income compare to analyst expectations and consensus estimates?

Answer

The press release you quoted reports that New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) generated net investment income of $34.5 million, or $0.32 per weighted‑average share for the quarter ended June 30 2025.

Unfortunately, the release (and the excerpt you provided) does not include any information about analyst expectations or consensus estimates for this metric. Consequently, we cannot directly compare the reported $0.32 per‑share net investment income to what Wall Street analysts had forecasted for the quarter.

Below is a concise overview of what we can say, and what steps you can take to obtain the missing comparison data:

1. What the $0.32 per‑share figure tells us

2. Why analyst expectations matter

• Consensus estimates (often compiled by data providers such as Bloomberg, FactSet, Thomson Reuters, or S&P Capital IQ) represent the average earnings or per‑share metric that Wall Street analysts expect a company to deliver for a given period.
• Beat vs. miss: If a company reports a per‑share net investment income that is higher than the consensus estimate, analysts typically view it as a “beat,” which can lead to a positive price reaction. Conversely, a “miss” can pressure the stock.

Because the press release does not disclose the consensus estimate for net investment income per share, we cannot label the $0.32 figure as a beat or miss.

3. How to find the analyst consensus estimate

1. Financial data platforms – Log into Bloomberg, FactSet, Thomson Reuters, or S&P Capital IQ and look up the “NMFC” ticker. Search for the “Earnings Estimates” or “Consensus Estimates” section, then locate the line‑item for Net Investment Income per Share (or Net Investment Income, EPS‑type metric) for the quarter ending June 30 2025.
2. Brokerage research – Many broker‑dealing platforms (e.g., TD Ameritrade, E*TRADE, Fidelity) provide analyst consensus data in their “Company Overview” or “Research” tabs.
3. SEC filings – The company’s Form 10‑Q for the quarter will sometimes include a “Management Discussion & Analysis” (MD&A) that references prior analyst expectations, though it is less common for per‑share net investment income.
4. Press releases from analysts – Occasionally, analysts issue “Earnings Preview” notes that list their expectations. A quick web search for “New Mountain Finance NMFC Q2 2025 net investment income estimate” may surface such commentary.

4. What you can do next

• Retrieve the consensus estimate for net investment income per share from one of the sources above.
• Calculate the variance:
  [ \text{Variance (\%)} = \frac{\text{Reported} - \text{Consensus}}{\text{Consensus}} \times 100 ]
  This will tell you whether the $0.32 figure is a beat or miss and by how much.
• Contextualize with historical performance: Compare the $0.32 per‑share figure to NMFC’s net investment income per share in prior quarters (e.g., Q2 2024, Q2 2023) to gauge the company’s trend.
• Consider other metrics: Net investment income per share is only one piece of the earnings puzzle. Look at total net investment income, net asset value (NAV) per share, and the portfolio’s credit‑quality heatmap (the release notes that ~95% of the portfolio is “green”) to form a holistic view of profitability and risk.

5. Bottom line

• Current data: $0.32 per weighted‑average share net investment income for Q2 2025.
• Missing data: No analyst consensus estimate is provided in the release, so a direct comparison cannot be made here.
• Action: Access a financial data service or brokerage platform to retrieve the consensus estimate, then compute the beat/miss and assess the market’s reaction accordingly.

If you obtain the consensus figure and would like help interpreting the variance (e.g., “What does a 5% beat mean for NMFC’s valuation?”), feel free to share it and I can walk you through the implications.