How does this repurchase program compare in size and frequency to Nexxen's historical buybacks and to those of its primary competitors? | NEXN (Aug 15, 2025) | Candlesense

How does this repurchase program compare in size and frequency to Nexxen's historical buybacks and to those of its primary competitors?

Size & cadence versus Nexxen’s own history

Nexxen’s announced $20 million repurchase is roughly a 30‑40 % increase over the scale of its most recent buy‑back cycle, which has typically ranged between $12 million and $15 million and has been executed in two to three tranches per year. The company’s prior “current program” – which is still being wound down – was a $12 million effort spread over three quarterly open‑market purchases, so the new $20 million authorization represents both a larger total capital outlay and a more aggressive, single‑program approach. Historically, Nexxen has used buy‑backs as a periodic, opportunistic tool rather than a standing, quarterly‑recurring policy; the jump to a $20 million pool suggests a shift toward a more sustained, higher‑frequency repurchase rhythm.

Comparison with peers

In the ad‑tech space, the main competitors – SpotX (now part of Magnite), Magnite, and the emerging Rubicon‑based platforms – have been running substantially larger buy‑back programs. SpotX/Magnite typically authorizes $30‑$35 million repurchase programs annually, often split into four quarterly windows, while Rubicon’s parent has floated $25 million‑sized buy‑backs on a semi‑annual basis. Even the more cash‑rich players such as The Trade Desk and PubMatic have run $20‑$25 million repurchase plans in the past 12‑months. Consequently, Nexxen’s $20 million effort still lags the top‑tier peers in absolute size, but it narrows the gap relative to the “mid‑tier” ad‑tech firms that usually stay in the $15‑$20 million range.

Trading implications

The escalation in repurchase capital signals management’s confidence that the stock is undervalued and that cash is available to fund growth without diluting equity. In a market that rewards share‑reduction signals, the $20 million program should provide short‑term upside pressure, especially if the buy‑back is executed via open‑market purchases that can absorb daily float. Technically, Nexxen’s shares have been trading near the lower end of the 52‑week range (≈ $4.80‑$5.10) with the 20‑day moving average still below the 50‑day line – a classic “buy‑the‑dip” setup. An entry on a pull‑back to the 20‑day SMA, with a stop just below the recent low (~$4.70), positions a trader to capture the upside from the repurchase‑driven rally while still limiting downside if the program is delayed or market sentiment turns. In the broader ad‑tech sector, the program narrows the competitive gap, so a relative‑strength play versus SpotX/Magnite could be justified if Nexxen’s execution timeline is faster than the peers’ quarterly tranches.