What is the timeline for the lawsuit resolution and could it create nearâterm volatility in the stock?
Resolution timeline
The ShareholdersâŻFoundation filing does not specify a courtâset deadline, but most securitiesâclassâaction suits move through a âclaimsâmakingâ phase that lasts 60â90âŻdays, followed by a period of discovery and possible settlement negotiations that can stretch 12â18âŻmonths. In practice, a Neogen (NEOG) case that was filed in AugustâŻ2025 is unlikely to be fully resolved before the lateâ2025âŻto earlyâ2026 window. Until a settlement or a courtâissued decision is announced, the case will remain âopenâ and subject to periodic updates (e.g., claimâsubmission extensions, mediation dates, or a scheduled trial).
Nearâterm volatility impact
Because the suit targets investors who bought beforeâŻJanâŻ2023âa cohort that still holds a sizable portion of the floatâthe market will treat the pending litigation as a shortâterm catalyst. Anticipated volatility stems from two sources:
- Legalânews flow: Any new filing, deadline, or settlementâtalk (even a ânoâcauseâ dismissal) will trigger rapid price swings as retail and institutional holders adjust exposure. Expect a Bollingerâbandâwide bounce or a 15â20âŻ% intraday swing around the dates of courtâdocket releases or settlementânegotiation updates.
- Liquidityâstress: The classâaction could prompt a modest wave of forcedâsale or âholdâtoâsettleâ activity, especially if a settlement requires cash outlay. This can temporarily thin the order book, amplifying price moves on modest volume.
Trading implications
- Shortâterm: Keep a tightâââstop or a defined risk band (â2â3âŻ% of the current price) if you are long, as the upside can be eroded quickly on negative legal news. Conversely, a buyâonâdip if the stock breaks below a key support level (e.g., the 20âday EMA) and the legal narrative stays neutral could capture a bounce when the market digests the news.
- Mediumâterm: If the case drifts toward a settlement in lateâŻ2025/earlyâŻ2026, the upside may be capped by the expected cash outlay. Position sizing should therefore be modest, with a view to exit before the settlement window or to roll the position into a defensive, lowerâvolatility sector if the legal risk dominates the stockâs fundamentals.
In short, the lawsuit is unlikely to be resolved before Q4âŻ2025âŻââŻQ1âŻ2026, and the uncertainty will generate nearâterm volatility that can be traded with tight risk controls and attention to legalâfiling dates.