How does CrashPlan's Azure‑centric offering compare to similar solutions from competitors like Rubrik or Veeam? | MSFT (Aug 07, 2025) | Candlesense
MSFT

How does CrashPlan's Azure‑centric offering compare to similar solutions from competitors like Rubrik or Veeam?

Answer

Below is a side‑by‑side comparison of CrashPlan’s newly‑announced Azure‑centric solution with the comparable Microsoft 365 data‑protection offerings from Rubrik and Veeam. Because the press release only outlines the high‑level focus of CrashPlan’s demo (Azure‑centric cyber‑resiliency, data‑protection, rapid recovery, and compliance for Microsoft 365), the comparison draws on the typical capabilities and market positioning of each vendor to highlight where CrashPlan’s approach is likely to differ or overlap with its rivals.

Dimension CrashPlan (Azure‑centric) Rubrik Veeam
Core Architecture • Built natively on Microsoft Azure – all data, metadata, and management services run inside Azure storage and Azure‑native services (e.g., Azure Blob, Azure AD, Azure Policy).
• Leverages Azure’s security stack (Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Azure Sentinel integration) for “cyber‑resiliency.”		 • Hybrid‑cloud architecture – Rubrik’s SaaS platform can protect data to Azure, AWS, GCP, or on‑prem storage.
• Uses a “Rubrik Cloud Data Management” (RCDM) fabric that abstracts the destination, but Azure is one of many supported clouds.		 • Multi‑cloud backup and replication – Veeam Backup & Replication (or Veeam SaaS) can target Azure Blob, Azure Files, as well as AWS S3, GCP, and on‑prem.
• Offers both agent‑based and “Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365” (formerly Veeam Backup for O365) that is cloud‑agnostic.
Primary Value Proposition (as per the news) • Azure‑first: Optimized for Microsoft 365 workloads that already live in Azure (e.g., Teams, SharePoint, Exchange Online).
• Rapid recovery: By keeping backup data in Azure’s high‑performance storage tiers (Hot/ Cool/ Archive) and using Azure’s low‑latency networking, restores can be completed faster than a generic multi‑cloud pull.
• Compliance baked in: Direct use of Azure Policy, Azure Blueprint, and Microsoft 365 compliance controls (e.g., retention policies, data‑loss‑prevention) to meet regulatory requirements.		 • Unified data management: One platform for backup, instant recovery, archival, and analytics across on‑prem, cloud, and SaaS.
• Policy‑driven automation: Rubrik’s “Policy‑Driven Automation” lets customers set SLAs for RTO/RPO, compliance, and data‑governance across all environments.
• Marketplace integrations: Rubrik Connectors for Microsoft 365, Azure, and other SaaS apps, but Azure is not the exclusive data store.		 • Broad protection suite: Veeam covers backup, disaster‑recovery, monitoring, and observability for both on‑prem VMs and SaaS (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace).
• Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365: Directly backs up Teams, SharePoint, Exchange, OneDrive, with granular restore capabilities.
• Flexibility of storage: Customers can choose Azure, AWS, GCP, or local storage for backup targets, which can be a benefit for heterogeneous environments.
Integration with Microsoft 365 • Demoed at TechCon 365 Atlanta – the press release emphasizes a live demonstration of “Azure‑centric cyber resiliency, data protection, rapid recovery and compliance for Microsoft 365.”
• Likely uses Microsoft Graph APIs and Azure AD for seamless authentication and policy enforcement.		 • Rubrik Cloud Data Management for Microsoft 365 already supports backup of Teams, SharePoint, Exchange, OneDrive, with granular restore.
• Integration is via Microsoft Graph and Azure AD, but the platform is not Azure‑only; customers can store backups in any cloud.		 • Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 also uses Microsoft Graph and Azure AD for data ingestion.
• Offers direct-to-Azure backup as one of many options, plus the ability to store backups on‑prem or in other clouds.
Recovery Speed & RTO • Azure‑native storage tiers (Hot, Cool, Archive) and Azure Private Link can reduce network hops, enabling sub‑minute RTO for most Microsoft 365 objects when using the “Hot” tier.
• Azure’s Global CDN can be leveraged for cross‑region restores, further accelerating recovery for distributed teams.		 • Rubrik’s “Instant Recovery” can spin up a VM from backup snapshots in minutes, but recovery speed for SaaS objects depends on the chosen storage location (Azure, AWS, etc.).
• RTO is policy‑driven; typical RTO for Microsoft 365 objects is 15‑30 minutes when using Azure as the target.		 • Veeam’s “Instant VM Recovery” and “Granular Microsoft 365 Restore” are fast, but the RTO is influenced by the storage tier selected.
• When using Azure Blob “Hot” tier, Veeam can achieve RTO comparable to CrashPlan; with “Cool” or “Archive” tiers, RTO can be longer.
Compliance & Governance • Built‑in Azure Policy & Blueprint support for standards such as HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, CMMC.
• Automatic retention‑policy mapping to Microsoft 365 compliance policies (e.g., “Retention labels”).
• Auditable logs stored in Azure Log Analytics for full traceability.		 • Rubrik provides policy‑based governance across clouds, with audit logs stored in the Rubrik platform (can be forwarded to Azure Sentinel, AWS CloudTrail, etc.).
• Supports compliance frameworks but requires additional configuration to map to Azure‑specific controls.		 • Veeam offers policy‑driven retention and immutable backups (via Azure Immutable Blob storage).
• Compliance reporting is available through Veeam’s Backup & Replication console and can be exported to Azure Sentinel or third‑party SIEMs.
Pricing Model • Azure‑first SaaS subscription – pricing is typically per‑TB of protected data, with Azure consumption (storage, egress) billed separately.
• May include “Azure Reserved Capacity” discounts for long‑term storage.		 • Per‑node or per‑TB licensing, plus optional “Rubrik Cloud Data Management” consumption‑based fees for SaaS workloads.
• Multi‑cloud flexibility can lead to higher total cost if data is spread across several clouds.		 • Per‑TB or per‑user licensing for Microsoft 365 backup, plus separate licensing for on‑prem VM protection.
• Storage costs are separate (Azure Blob, AWS S3, etc.).
Target Customer Profile • Organizations that have already committed to Azure – especially those using Microsoft 365 as their primary productivity suite and looking for a “single‑cloud” data‑protection strategy.
• Mid‑size to large enterprises that value tight integration with Azure security and compliance services.		 • Multi‑cloud enterprises that need a unified data‑management platform spanning on‑prem, Azure, AWS, GCP, and SaaS.
• Companies that want a single pane of glass for backup, DR, and analytics across heterogeneous environments.		 • Broad‑scope customers that protect both on‑prem VMs and SaaS workloads, often with a “best‑of‑both‑worlds” approach (on‑prem + cloud).
• Organizations that already use Veeam for VM backup and want to extend the same toolset to Microsoft 365.
Key Differentiators (based on the news) • Azure‑centric – the solution is purpose‑built for Azure, promising the fastest, most seamless recovery for Microsoft 365 data that lives in Azure.
• Live demo at TechCon 365 – CrashPlan is positioning itself as a thought‑leader in Azure‑first cyber‑resiliency, directly addressing the “Azure‑native” concerns of Microsoft‑centric customers.		 • Hybrid‑cloud flexibility – Rubrik can protect data wherever it lives, not just in Azure.
• Broad data‑management capabilities (e.g., analytics, data‑fabric, instant‑mass‑restore) that go beyond pure backup.		 • Extensive product portfolio – Veeam covers a wider range of workloads (VMs, containers, databases) and offers deep features for immutable backups, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, and observability.
• Choice of storage – customers can pick the most cost‑effective cloud for each workload.

Bottom‑Line Takeaways

  1. CrashPlan’s Azure‑first focus is its strongest differentiator. If your organization is already an Azure‑centric shop (or plans to be), CrashPlan’s solution is likely to give you the shortest recovery times, simplest compliance mapping, and tightest integration with Azure security services—all of which were highlighted in the TechCon 365 demo.

  2. Rubrik excels when you need one platform to protect data across multiple clouds and on‑prem environments. Its Azure‑centric capabilities are solid, but the product is not limited to Azure, which can be a benefit (or a drawback) depending on your cloud strategy.

  3. Veeam offers the widest workload coverage (VMs, containers, databases, plus Microsoft 365) and the most storage flexibility. Its Azure integration is strong, but it is fundamentally a multi‑cloud backup suite rather than an Azure‑only solution.

  4. Choosing the right tool depends on three strategic questions:

    • Is Azure your primary cloud? If yes, CrashPlan’s Azure‑centric offering may deliver the fastest, most compliant recovery for Microsoft 365.
    • Do you need to protect data across several clouds or on‑prem? If yes, Rubrik’s hybrid‑cloud platform may be a better fit.
    • Do you already own Veeam for VM backup and want to extend it to Microsoft 365? If yes, Veeam can provide a unified backup/DR experience with the flexibility to store data wherever you prefer.

  5. From a compliance perspective, CrashPlan’s direct use of Azure Policy and Blueprint could reduce the administrative overhead of mapping SaaS data‑protection policies to regulatory controls—something Rubrik and Veeam can do, but typically requires extra configuration.

  6. Pricing will likely be comparable on a per‑TB basis, but CrashPlan’s Azure‑centric model may allow Azure Reserved Capacity discounts and native cost‑optimizations that Rubrik and Veeam customers would need to negotiate separately.

How to Evaluate Further

  • Request a proof‑of‑concept at the upcoming TechCon 365 demo (or a follow‑up session) to see actual RTO numbers for Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange restores from CrashPlan’s Azure “Hot” tier.
  • Map your compliance requirements (HIPAA, GDPR, CMMC, etc.) to each vendor’s built‑in controls and see which solution offers the most out‑of‑the‑box alignment.
  • Calculate total cost of ownership (TCO) by combining storage (Azure Blob), SaaS licensing, and any additional Azure services (e.g., Azure Sentinel) that CrashPlan may leverage versus the cross‑cloud storage costs in Rubrik or Veeam.
  • Consider future roadmap – if you anticipate moving workloads to other clouds, a multi‑cloud platform (Rubrik or Veeam) may protect you from vendor lock‑in; if you expect to stay Azure‑first, CrashPlan’s focused roadmap could be advantageous.

In short: CrashPlan’s newly announced Azure‑centric offering is tailored for organizations that want the fastest, most integrated recovery and compliance experience for Microsoft 365 within Azure. Rubrik and Veeam remain strong alternatives, especially for multi‑cloud or broader workload coverage, but they lack the singular Azure‑first design that CrashPlan is emphasizing at TechCon 365 Atlanta. Your choice should hinge on your cloud strategy, compliance needs, and whether you value a single‑cloud, tightly‑integrated solution (CrashPlan) over a flexible, cross‑cloud data‑management platform (Rubrik) or a comprehensive backup suite with extensive storage options (Veeam).

Other Questions About This News

What are the potential implications for Microsoft's compliance and data‑privacy positioning with regulators? How might investors interpret the sentiment score of 40 in terms of market enthusiasm? Is there any indication that this partnership will affect Microsoft's market share in the data protection space? How might this partnership affect Microsoft's Azure revenue growth in the cybersecurity segment? What is the expected impact of this announcement on MSFT's stock price in the short term? Will the CrashPlan demo at TechCon 365 Atlanta drive increased demand for Microsoft 365 security solutions? Does this event signal a strategic shift for Microsoft towards deeper integration with third‑party backup providers? Could the demonstration lead to new enterprise contracts that boost Microsoft’s cloud adoption rates? Will the visibility at TechCon 365 Atlanta translate into measurable financial benefits for Microsoft in the upcoming quarters?