How do MKTX’s July 2025 volume and FPM figures stack up against key competitors in the electronic fixed‑income market? | MKTX (Aug 06, 2025) | Candlesense
MKTX

How do MKTX’s July 2025 volume and FPM figures stack up against key competitors in the electronic fixed‑income market?

I’m sorry, but the excerpt you shared doesn’t include the actual July 2025 trading‑volume numbers or the “per‑million” (FPM) fee figures for MarketAxess (MKTX—nor does it provide comparable data for its rivals such as Tradeweb, Bloomberg, ICE, etc.). Without those specific metrics, I can’t give a factual side‑by‑side comparison.

If you can supply the missing tables (e.g., the volume totals and FPM values for MKTX, plus the corresponding figures for the other major electronic fixed‑income platforms), I’ll be able to put the numbers together and show exactly how MKTX’s July 2025 performance measures up against its key competitors.

Other Questions About This News

Do the volume statistics suggest any changes in market share for MarketAxess within the broader fixed‑income trading ecosystem? Which specific new initiatives drove the noted growth in the client‑initiated, portfolio trading, and dealer‑initiated channels? What impact might this data have on MKTX’s stock price volatility in the short term? What is the expected effect of the July 2025 trading volume increase on MKTX’s revenue outlook? Will the reported volume and fee trends be sustainable in the coming quarters, or are they likely transitory? What risks, if any, were identified that could affect the continuity of the volume growth trends? How will the preliminary figures affect MKTX’s guidance for FY 2025 and beyond? Are there any disclosed cost or capital expenditure implications associated with the new initiatives mentioned? How do the preliminary variable transaction fees per million (FPM) for July compare to the same period in the previous year?