CHICAGO, Aug. 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- LanzaTech Global, Inc. (“LanzaTech” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: LNZA), a leading carbon capture and transformation company, today announced that it will implement a 1-for-100 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of its issued and outstanding common stock (the “Common Stock”), effective August 18, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Immediately prior to effecting the Reverse Stock Split, LanzaTech will decrease the par value of the Common Stock from $0.0001 to $0.0000001 per share (the “Par Value Change”) and increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 600,000,000 to 2,580,000,000 (the “Authorized Share Increase”). At the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of authorized shares of Common Stock will be proportionately decreased to 25,800,000. The Reverse Stock Split, Par Value Change, and Authorized Share Increase were approved by stockholders at LanzaTech's 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on
Related Questions
How will the 1‑for‑100 reverse stock split affect LanzaTech’s share price and trading volume?
Will the reverse split improve the company’s compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid‑price requirement and prevent a possible delisting?
What is the market’s perception of the reverse split—does it signal underlying financial weakness or a strategic move?
How will the reduction in authorized shares from 2.58 billion to 25.8 million impact future equity‑capital‑raising plans?
Will the reverse split affect existing options, warrants, and convertible securities, and how will those contracts be adjusted?
How might the reverse split influence short‑interest dynamics and potential short‑covering activity?
Is there any anticipated impact on LanzaTech’s inclusion in major indices or on index‑fund holdings?
What is the expected timeline for the reverse split to be reflected in market pricing and for any post‑split volatility to subside?
Will the reverse split have any effect on the company’s ability to issue new shares for acquisitions, partnerships, or employee equity programs?
How does this reverse split compare to recent reverse splits in the carbon‑capture or clean‑technology sector, and what can be learned from those cases?
What are the tax implications for existing shareholders resulting from the reverse split and par‑value change?
What communication strategy is the company employing to manage investor expectations and mitigate potential negative sentiment?