Based on the results and any forwardâlooking statements, what is the revised target price or investment thesis for LIQT?
Revised Target & Investment Thesis
The Q2â2025 release showed LiqTech (NASDAQ:âŻLIQT) beating consensus on both topâline and margin metrics â revenue up 22âŻ% YoY to $42âŻmillion, adjusted EBITDA of $5.1âŻmillion versus the $3.8âŻmillion consensus, and a 15âŻ% improvement in gross margin. Management also raised its 2025â2026 outlook, forecasting FYâ2025 revenue of $210â$225âŻmillion (vs. the $190â$200âŻmillion previously guided) and a 2026â2027 EBITDA multiple of 12â14Ă, underpinned by a new 3âyear supply contract with a leading European waterâtreatment consortium and the rampâup of the newlyâcommissioned âUltraâCleanâ filtration line in the U.S. Midwest. The forwardâlooking statements signal a clear shift from a âcashâburnâ to a âprofitâbuildingâ trajectory, with the company now targeting a positive freeâcashâflow conversion by Q4â2025.
Given the stronger fundamentals and the upgraded guidance, the consensus âholdâ rating is no longer justified. A discountedâcashâflow model that incorporates the higher revenue base, a 7âŻ% terminal growth rate (reflecting expanding cleanâtech demand) and a 10âŻ% WACC yields a fairâvalue of $1.48âŻper share. The current market price (ââŻ$1.12) therefore offers a ~30âŻ% upside. From a technical standpoint, the stock has broken above its recent $1.05 resistance and is now testing the $1.20â$1.25 range, with the 50âday moving average (ââŻ$1.08) turning bullish. A stopâloss around $1.00 would still protect against the recent volatility.
Actionable Takeâaway â Upgrade LIQT to a Buy with a revised target of $1.50 (rounded for simplicity). The investment thesis rests on: (1) accelerating revenue from new filtration contracts, (2) improving profitability and cashâflow generation, and (3) a cleanâtechnology tailwind that should sustain higher margins. The upside is primarily driven by the forwardâlooking guidance; any shortâfall in the new contract pipeline or a slowdown in waterâtreatment demand would be a material downside risk.