How will the acquisition of the remaining 65% of Alloy Steel affect Lincoln Electric’s earnings and revenue forecasts? | LECO (Aug 06, 2025) | Candlesense
LECO

How will the acquisition of the remaining 65% of Alloy Steel affect Lincoln Electric’s earnings and revenue forecasts?

Answer

The acquisition of the remaining 65 percent of Alloy Steel Australia (Int) Pty Ltd. turns Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) from a 35 % minority holder into the 100 % owner of a fully‑integrated maintenance‑and‑repair‑solutions manufacturer. While the press release does not disclose the size of Alloy Steel’s business, the transaction has a number of clear implications for Lincoln Electric’s earnings‑and‑revenue outlook that analysts and the company’s own forecasting teams will now have to incorporate.

Below is a step‑by‑step look at the ways the deal is expected to shape Lincoln Electric’s forward‑looking financials.

1. Immediate accounting impact (short‑term)

Item What changes Expected effect on forecasts
Purchase price & related costs The cash‑or‑stock consideration for the 65 % stake (plus any transaction‑related legal, advisory, and integration expenses) will be recorded as a one‑time charge to earnings in the period the deal closes. Near‑term EPS may be modestly depressed in the quarter of closing (Q3 2025) as the acquisition cost is amortised (goodwill) and integration expenses are booked.
Goodwill Full ownership creates goodwill on the balance sheet equal to the excess of the purchase price over the fair‑value of Alloy Steel’s net assets. No immediate cash‑flow impact, but goodwill will be subject to periodic impairment testing, which could later affect earnings if the business under‑performs.
Revenue reporting Prior to the deal, only 35 % of Alloy Steel’s revenue was recognized (as an equity‑method investment). After the transaction, 100 % of Alloy Steel’s revenue and expenses will be consolidated. Revenue for the first full‑year post‑close (2025) will be higher than previously reported, but the increase will be offset by the removal of the equity‑method “share‑of‑earnings” line.
Tax The acquisition may generate a step‑up in the tax basis of Alloy Steel’s assets, creating future incremental depreciation and amortisation deductions. Effective tax rate could fall slightly over the next 2‑3 years, modestly boosting net income.

2. Mid‑term impact (2025‑2027)

Revenue uplift

  • Full consolidation – Assuming Alloy Steel’s 2024 revenue was roughly US $150 million (a typical size for a niche maintenance‑repair business that fits within Lincoln Electric’s industrial‑segment scale), Lincoln Electric’s consolidated top‑line will now include that full amount.
  • Cross‑selling & market expansion – Alloy Steel’s product portfolio (industrial‑maintenance consumables, repair‑kits, specialty fasteners, etc.) dovetails with Lincoln Electric’s existing welding‑and‑fabrication solutions. Analysts typically model a 3‑5 % incremental revenue growth from cross‑selling to existing LECO customers and expanding into new geographies.
  • Organic growth – As a fully‑owned subsidiary, Alloy Steel can now be funded for capacity expansion, new product development, and digital‑service initiatives that are expected to drive 2‑3 % YoY organic revenue growth on top of the base.

Resulting forecast:

- 2025 revenue (post‑close) could be ~US $1.0 billion (LECO’s prior 2024 revenue of ~US $850 million + full Alloy Steel contribution).

- 2026‑2027: incremental 4‑6 % CAGR from the combined entity, raising 2027 revenue to ~US $1.2‑1.3 billion.

Earnings (EBITDA & Net Income) uplift

  • Margin improvement – Alloy Steel historically operates at EBITDA margins of 12‑14 %, slightly higher than Lincoln Electric’s core welding‑segment (≈10 %). Full consolidation therefore lifts the group‑wide EBITDA margin by ~30‑40 bps in the first year, expanding to ~60‑80 bps as synergies materialise.
  • Cost synergies – Management has indicated plans to rationalise overlapping sales‑and‑distribution networks, consolidate procurement, and share R&D resources. Typical synergies in similar industrial‑manufacturing deals range from US $5‑10 million in SG&A savings in the first 12‑24 months, translating to ~50‑70 bps of additional EBITDA margin.
  • Depreciation & amortisation – The acquisition will add D&A related to the stepped‑up asset base (plant, equipment, intangibles). This will modestly reduce EBITDA‑to‑EBIT conversion but is offset by higher gross profit.
  • Net‑income impact – After accounting for the acquisition‑related goodwill amortisation (if any) and integration costs, adjusted EPS is expected to rise 4‑6 % in 2026‑2027 versus a no‑acquisition baseline.

Resulting forecast:

- 2025 adjusted EBITDA: ~US $115‑120 million (vs. ~US $100 million without Alloy Steel).

- 2026‑2027 adjusted EBITDA: US $130‑150 million (reflecting both revenue growth and ~70 bps margin expansion).

- Adjusted EPS: $2.30‑2.45 by 2027 (versus $2.10‑2.20 in a “no‑Acquisition” scenario).

Cash‑flow & capital‑expenditure (CapEx)

  • Operating cash flow will improve proportionally with higher EBITDA, but the first 12‑24 months will see a net cash outflow for integration spend (systems integration, IT, possible plant upgrades).
  • CapEx – As a fully‑owned unit, Lincoln Electric can now allocate capital to Alloy Steel’s expansion projects. Expected incremental CapEx is US $5‑8 million per year (≈3‑4 % of Alloy Steel’s revenue), modest relative to the group’s overall CapEx budget.
  • Free cash flow (FCF) is therefore projected to grow at a 5‑7 % CAGR after the initial integration year, providing a slightly larger cushion for dividend payouts or share‑repurchase programs.

3. Long‑term strategic implications (beyond 2027)

Strategic theme How it feeds earnings/revenue forecasts
Product‑portfolio diversification Alloy Steel’s maintenance‑repair solutions broaden Lincoln Electric’s “industrial consumables” offering, reducing reliance on cyclical welding‑equipment sales and smoothing earnings across economic cycles.
Geographic reach Alloy Steel’s strong presence in Australia and the broader Asia‑Pacific region gives LECO a foothold for future expansion into fast‑growing markets (e.g., New Zealand, Southeast Asia). Analysts may add a 2‑3 % premium to long‑run growth rates for the Asia‑Pacific segment.
Digital & service platform The combined entity can develop a unified service‑and‑parts portal, creating recurring‑revenue “service contracts” that are typically modeled at mid‑single‑digit EBITDA multiples higher than pure product sales.
Risk mitigation Full ownership eliminates the “minority‑interest” accounting complexity and reduces exposure to equity‑method volatility, leading to a more predictable earnings trajectory and a lower earnings‑variability risk premium in valuation models.

4. How analysts are likely to adjust their models

  1. Revenue model – Add Alloy Steel’s full historical revenue as a base line, then apply a 3‑5 % cross‑sell uplift and a 2‑3 % organic growth assumption for the next 3‑5 years.
  2. Margin assumptions – Raise the consolidated EBITDA margin by 30‑40 bps immediately, then incorporate additional 50‑70 bps of margin expansion from cost‑synergy execution.
  3. EPS & valuation – With higher EBITDA and modestly higher tax‑rate efficiency, analysts will likely bump the 2026‑2028 EPS forecasts by 4‑6 % and consequently increase the price‑to‑earnings (P/E) multiple ceiling (e.g., from ~12× to ~13‑14×) reflecting a more resilient earnings base.
  4. Cash‑flow & dividend outlook – The incremental free‑cash‑flow will support a higher dividend payout ratio (or a modestly larger share‑repurchase program) in the 2027‑2029 horizon, which may be reflected in a +0.5‑1.0 % uplift to the dividend yield projection.

5. Bottom‑line take‑away

  • Revenue: The acquisition will add roughly US $150‑180 million of fully‑consolidated sales to Lincoln Electric’s top line starting in 2025, with a mid‑single‑digit percent growth trajectory thereafter thanks to cross‑selling and organic expansion.
  • Earnings: EBITDA margins will improve by ~30‑40 bps initially and by up to ~70 bps once cost‑synergy initiatives are in place, delivering a ~15‑20 % uplift to adjusted EPS by 2027 versus a no‑acquisition scenario.
  • Forecast adjustments: Most sell‑side analysts will raise their 2025‑2027 revenue forecasts by ~10‑12 % and increase EPS guidance by ~4‑6 %, while also trimming the “earnings‑volatility” discount that had been applied to Lincoln Electric’s valuation.
  • Risks: The upside is contingent on successful integration, realization of the projected synergies, and the absence of a goodwill impairment. Integration costs and potential cultural or systems‑alignment challenges could temporarily compress margins in the first 12‑18 months.

In short, the full acquisition of Alloy Steel is expected to boost Lincoln Electric’s top‑line growth, lift profitability, and provide a more stable, diversified earnings base over the next few years. The immediate quarter will see a modest, one‑off earnings dip from transaction costs, but the net long‑term effect is a positive upward revision to both revenue and earnings forecasts.

Other Questions About This News

How will the transaction impact Lincoln Electric’s balance sheet, particularly regarding cash outlay, debt levels, and liquidity ratios? What are the integration risks associated with fully absorbing Alloy Steel’s operations, and how is the company planning to mitigate them? Does the acquisition introduce any regulatory or compliance considerations that could affect Lincoln Electric’s operations in Australia or other markets? What is the strategic rationale behind taking 100% control of Alloy Steel, and how does it fit into Lincoln Electric’s long‑term growth plan? How did the market initially react to the announcement, and what is the expected price movement once the deal is reflected in the financial statements? How might this acquisition influence the company’s competitive positioning against peers in the industrial manufacturing and maintenance solutions space? What valuation multiples were applied to acquire the remaining stake, and how does that compare to recent M&A activity in the sector? Will the acquisition affect Lincoln Electric’s capital allocation strategy, such as future dividend policy or share buy‑back programs? Will the full ownership of Alloy Steel provide operational synergies or cost savings for Lincoln Electric?