Does the agreement contain any covenants or restrictions that could limit LandBridge’s ability to enter into other agreements in the Delaware Basin? | LB (Aug 06, 2025) | Candlesense
LB

Does the agreement contain any covenants or restrictions that could limit LandBridge’s ability to enter into other agreements in the Delaware Basin?

Answer

Based on the information that was released in the Business Wire announcement, the agreement between LandBridge Company LLC (LB) and Devon Energy Corp. (DVN) is described only in terms of its headline terms:

Item Description (as reported)
Type of agreement 10‑year surface‑use and pore‑space reservation agreement
Geographic focus Core of the New Mexico Delaware Basin, specifically the East Stateline Ranch and Speed Ranch surface acreage
Pore‑space capacity 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) reserved for Devon
Duration 10 years, with the reservation to commence on the date specified in the press release

The press release does not include any language about:

  • Exclusivity clauses – e.g., a requirement that LandBridge cannot lease or sell surface rights or pore‑space capacity to any other party in the Delaware Basin during the term of the agreement.
  • Non‑compete covenants – e.g., a prohibition on LandBridge entering into similar surface‑use or pore‑space contracts with other operators.
  • Geographic restrictions – e.g., a limitation that LandBridge may only operate on the specific parcels mentioned (East Stateline Ranch and Speed Ranch) and not elsewhere in the basin.
  • Other contractual restraints – such as “right of first refusal,” “stand‑still” periods, or “use‑only” provisions that would affect future deals.

Because none of those elements are mentioned in the summary, we cannot confirm from this release whether the agreement contains covenants or restrictions that would limit LandBridge’s ability to pursue additional agreements in the Delaware Basin.

What this means for your question

  • If the agreement does contain such covenants – they would have to be disclosed in the full contract or in a more detailed press release. The current announcement does not provide that level of detail, so any conclusion about limitations would be speculative.
  • If the agreement does not contain such covenants – then, based solely on the information provided, there is no indication that LandBridge’s future flexibility in the basin is being curtailed.

Bottom line: The news article as it stands does not mention any covenants or restrictions that would limit LandBridge’s ability to enter into other agreements in the Delaware Basin. To determine definitively whether such provisions exist, you would need to review the actual agreement documents, a more detailed filing (e.g., an SEC Form 8‑K or a supplemental press release), or any subsequent disclosures that elaborate on the contract terms.

Other Questions About This News

What is the timeline for the commencement of pore space reservation and any milestone payments? What is the pricing structure for the pore space reservation – is it a fixed fee, variable per barrel, or a combination? Will this agreement increase LandBridge’s operating expenses (e.g., surface maintenance, infrastructure) and how are those costs accounted for? How will the 10‑year surface use and pore space reservation agreement with Devon affect LandBridge’s revenue and cash flow forecasts? What is the financial term of the agreement (e.g., royalties, lease payments, profit sharing) and how will it affect LandBridge’s earnings per share? How does the 300,000 bpd pore space capacity compare to LandBridge’s existing capacity and utilization rates? What is the impact on LandBridge’s reserve valuations and how might this affect analyst recommendations? What is the expected impact on LandBridge’s free cash flow and dividend sustainability? What is the risk profile for LandBridge, considering potential regulatory, environmental, or operational challenges associated with the 10‑year lease? Will the agreement increase LandBridge’s exposure to oil price volatility given the 300,000 bpd capacity is tied to Devon’s production volumes? How might this transaction affect LandBridge’s stock volatility and trading volume in the short‑term? Are there any upside participation provisions (e.g., profit sharing above a certain production threshold) that could enhance upside for LandBridge? How does this deal impact LandBridge’s balance sheet—will there be additional capital expenditures or debt incurred to support the agreement? How does this deal compare to similar surface‑use agreements that competitors (e.g., Viper Energy, Oasis Petroleum) have negotiated in the Delaware Basin?