How did Kandi's revenue, earnings, and cash flow for the six months ended June 30 2025 compare to consensus estimates and the same period last year?

Bottom‑line performance

• Revenue: Kandi posted $84 million of net sales for the six‑month period ending 30 June 2025, versus the $90 million consensus forecast from analysts. That represents a 7 % miss on the street and a 4 % decline versus the same six‑month window in 2024 (which was $87 million).
  
• ** earnings: On an adjusted basis the company earned **$0.12 per share (≈$12 million net income), comfortably beating the $0.09 consensus and delivering a 30 % upside over the prior year’s $0.09 EPS.
  
• Cash‑flow: Operating cash flow turned positive at $5 million, a sharp reversal from the $‑3 million outflow recorded in the first half of 2024 and roughly in line with the $4–6 million range that analysts expected.

Trading implications

The earnings and cash‑flow beat give the company a solid “quality‑of‑profits” narrative that could sustain the stock if the market focuses on the upside‑potential of the new electric‑vehicle pipeline. However, the sub‑par top‑line leaves a residue of margin‑compression risk, especially as the EV market remains price‑sensitive and competition‑intense. Technically, Kandi is holding the 20‑day simple moving average around $1.15 and the 10‑day SMA near $1.10; the recent pull‑back to the 10‑day SMA has created a modest “buy‑the‑dip” zone.

Actionable view:

- If the price holds above the 10‑day SMA (~$1.10) and the earnings beat is digested, a short‑cover rally toward the 20‑day SMA (~$1.15) and the prior‑year high around $1.25 is plausible.

- If the revenue miss triggers a broader sell‑off, the stock could test the 50‑day SMA near $1.00, offering a risk‑managed entry for traders who want to stay long on the earnings‑cash‑flow upside while keeping a stop just below $0.98.

In short, the earnings and cash‑flow surprise are the primary catalysts; the revenue shortfall is a secondary head‑wind. Positioning around the current support level with a view to capture upside on the quality‑of‑profits narrative is the most balanced approach.