Is there any correlation between the sustainability ranking and Keysightâs revenue growth or margins in recent quarters?
Short answer:
Based solely on the information in the news release, we cannot establish a direct correlation between Keysight Technologiesâ improved sustainability ranking (rising from 247âŻth in 2024 to 127âŻth in 2025 on TIME/Statistaâs âWorldâs Most Sustainable Companiesâ list) and its revenue growth or profitâmargin performance in recent quarters. The press release does not provide any financial metricsâsuch as quarterly revenue, yearâoverâyear growth rates, or margin figuresâthat would allow us to link the two variables.
Why the current news isnât enough to assess correlation
What the news tells us | What we would need to test a correlation |
---|---|
Sustainability ranking â second consecutive year on the list; position improved to 127âŻth in 2025. | Financial performance data â quarterly or annual revenue, YoY growth rates, operating margin, net margin, EPS, etc., for the same periods (2024âŻQ1âQ4, 2025âŻQ1âQ2, etc.). |
Company statement â âproud to announce that it has significantly improved its position.â | Timeline alignment â dates of sustainabilityârelated initiatives (e.g., carbonâreduction projects, renewableâenergy purchases) and the dates of financial results releases. |
No mention of cost savings, operational efficiencies, or productâlevel impacts | Quantifiable link â data on cost reductions from sustainability measures (e.g., energyâcost savings, wasteâreduction savings) that could affect margins. |
Without any of the above financial details, any claim of a causal or even a statistical relationship would be speculative.
How a correlation could be examined (if the data were available)
Collect the data series
- Sustainability ranking (or a proxy such as a sustainability score) for each quarter or year.
- Financial metrics â quarterly revenue, YoY revenue growth, operating margin, net margin, free cash flow, etc.
- Sustainability ranking (or a proxy such as a sustainability score) for each quarter or year.
Statistical approach
- Scatterâplot: Plot sustainability score (or rank) against revenue growth or margin for each period.
- Correlation coefficient (Pearsonâs r): Quantifies the linear relationship.
- Regression analysis: Regress revenue growth or margin on the sustainability score while controlling for other variables (e.g., macroâeconomic conditions, R&D spend, product mix).
- Scatterâplot: Plot sustainability score (or rank) against revenue growth or margin for each period.
Interpretation
- Positive correlation (e.g., higher sustainability score â higher margin) could suggest that sustainability initiatives are generating cost efficiencies or premium pricing.
- No correlation would indicate that the ranking improvement is orthogonal to shortâterm financial performance, perhaps reflecting longerâterm strategic positioning rather than immediate profit impact.
- Positive correlation (e.g., higher sustainability score â higher margin) could suggest that sustainability initiatives are generating cost efficiencies or premium pricing.
Qualitative crossâcheck
- Review earnings call transcripts, management commentary, and sustainability reports for mentions of âcost savings from energy efficiency,â ârevenue uplift from greenâproduct lines,â or âmargin improvement linked to wasteâreduction programs.â
- Identify any leadâlag effects (e.g., sustainability projects that start in Q1 may only affect margins in Q3âQ4).
- Review earnings call transcripts, management commentary, and sustainability reports for mentions of âcost savings from energy efficiency,â ârevenue uplift from greenâproduct lines,â or âmargin improvement linked to wasteâreduction programs.â
What to look for in Keysightâs public filings
- Form 10âK / 10âQ: These documents typically contain a âManagementâs Discussion and Analysisâ (MD&A) section where the company may discuss the financial impact of sustainability initiatives.
- Sustainability or ESG Report: Keysight publishes an annual ESG report that often quantifies carbonâreduction, renewableâenergy usage, and associated cost savings.
- Investor presentations / earnings call transcripts: Executives sometimes highlight âgreenâmarginâ improvements or âsustainableârevenueâ growth (e.g., sales of lowâpower test equipment driven by environmentalâconscious customers).
If those sources show, for example, that a shift to renewableâenergyâpowered manufacturing reduced utility costs by XâŻ% and that this cost reduction coincided with a margin expansion in the same quarter, you could argue a partial correlation.
Practical next steps for a definitive answer
- Pull the latest quarterly earnings releases (e.g., FYâŻ2024 Q4, FYâŻ2025 Q1âQ2).
- Extract revenue and margin figures and compute YoY growth rates.
- Overlay the sustainability ranking timeline (2024 rankâŻ247 â 2025 rankâŻ127) and any disclosed sustainability milestones (e.g., 2024â2025 carbonâneutral manufacturing rollout).
- Run a quick correlation test (even a simple spreadsheet Pearson calculation) to see if thereâs any statistical relationship.
- Read the MD&A for any explicit statements linking sustainability actions to cost or revenue outcomes.
Bottom line
- From the press release alone: No evidence of a correlation can be drawn.
- From a broader data set: A meaningful analysis would require quarterly financial data and, ideally, a sustainability score or detailed ESG metrics for the same periods.
- Recommendation: Review Keysightâs recent 10âQ/10âK filings, ESG reports, and earnings call transcripts to gather the missing financial data and any management commentary on the financial impact of sustainability initiatives. Only then can a robust, dataâdriven assessment of correlation be performed.