How does IPC’s buyback rate compare with those of its peers in the upstream oil & gas sector? | IPCO (Aug 11, 2025) | Candlesense

How does IPC’s buyback rate compare with those of its peers in the upstream oil & gas sector?

Buy‑back intensity

During the August 4‑8 window IPC repurchased 98,900 shares. With IPC’s total issued share count hovering around 13 million, the repurchase represents roughly 0.75 % of the float in just five trading days—a 0.15 %‑per‑day cadence. In the upstream oil‑and‑gas peer group, most companies use their normal‑course issuer bids (NCIBs) at a slower pace: Suncor Energy, Canadian Natural Resources and Cenovus typically run 0.3‑0.5 % of their float per month (≈0.02‑0.03 % per day). By contrast, IPC’s weekly rate is 2‑3× faster than the average monthly burn‑rate of its peers, though still modest in absolute terms (well under the 2‑3 % annual caps that regulators impose).

Market and technical implications

The relatively aggressive weekly repurchase signals management’s confidence in the current valuation and provides a modest floor under the share price, especially as the broader sector is still wrestling with volatile oil prices and a modestly bullish technical outlook (IPC trades near the 50‑day moving average with a slight upward bias). The news is likely to generate short‑term buying pressure; however, the modest absolute size means the impact on liquidity and price is limited.

Trading action

- Short‑term: Look for a modest bounce on the news; a 5‑10 % upside target in the next 1‑2 weeks is plausible if the broader oil market stays steady.

- Medium‑term: If IPC’s NCIB continues at this rate, the cumulative buy‑back could reach 2‑3 % of the float within the year—still below peers’ annual targets (≈4‑5 %). Consider adding to positions on pull‑backs if the stock trades below its 50‑day SMA and oil fundamentals remain supportive.

- Risk: The buy‑back alone won’t offset macro‑risk (price of crude, regulatory changes). Monitor peer NCIB announcements; a slowdown in peer repurchases could further highlight IPC’s relatively more aggressive stance and provide a relative‑strength edge.