Are there any regulatory or compliance risks associated with the blockchain mining business that could affect operations? | INVU (Aug 13, 2025) | Candlesense

Are there any regulatory or compliance risks associated with the blockchain mining business that could affect operations?

Regulatory & Compliance Risks

The blockchain‑mining unit of Investview (INVU) is exposed to several growing regulatory pressures that could materially affect its cost structure and operating continuity. Most jurisdictions are moving from a “hands‑off” stance on cryptocurrency mining to a more interventionist approach, targeting energy consumption, environmental impact, and anti‑money‑laundering (AML) compliance. In the United States, the Department of Energy and various state utility commissions are tightening permits for high‑intensity electricity loads and may impose carbon‑pricing or renewable‑energy quotas that could raise the firm’s power costs or force the relocation of hash‑rate to greener sources. Europe and parts of Asia are likewise introducing “green‑mining” standards that require proof‑of‑origin certificates for electricity, and failure to obtain them can trigger fines or the revocation of operating licences. In addition, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the EU’s AMLD6 are extending know‑your‑customer (KYC) and transaction‑monitoring obligations to mining operators that sell mined coins directly to retail customers, raising the need for robust compliance infrastructure and increasing legal overhead.

Trading Implications

From a fundamentals perspective, these regulatory headwinds translate into a potential upside‑risk to operating expenses and a downside‑risk to hash‑rate growth if INVU must curtail or relocate mining rigs. Analysts should monitor: (1) any SEC filings or press releases detailing power‑purchase‑agreement (PPA) renewals, renewable‑energy certifications, or pending permit applications; (2) emerging legislation in key mining jurisdictions (e.g., New York’s “Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act” amendments, Texas utility reforms, EU taxonomy adoption) that could affect cost per kilowatt‑hour; and (3) any enforcement actions or AML compliance notices reported by the company. Technically, the stock has been trading in a narrow range around the $0.55‑$0.65 band, with the 50‑day EMA (~$0.60) acting as a dynamic support. If the company discloses a material regulatory setback (e.g., loss of a major PPA or a fine exceeding 5% of quarterly EBITDA), a break below the 50‑day EMA could trigger a short‑term sell‑off toward the $0.50 level, offering a potential entry point for contrarian buyers on a bounce back to the EMA. Conversely, a positive regulatory update—such as securing long‑term renewable‑energy contracts at below‑market rates—could lift sentiment, pushing the price toward the recent high near $0.71 and rewarding bullish positions. Given the current risk‑reward profile, maintaining a tight stop‑loss (≈$0.53) on long positions while watching for regulatory news flow is advisable.