What are the projected cost per kilogram of hydrogen produced at commercial scale, and how does it stack up against conventional steam‑methane reforming and other renewable hydrogen technologies? | HYSR (Aug 11, 2025) | Candlesense

What are the projected cost per kilogram of hydrogen produced at commercial scale, and how does it stack up against conventional steam‑methane reforming and other renewable hydrogen technologies?

Projected cost

SunHydrogen’s own modelling (released in its investor deck after the live demo) projects a commercial‑scale production cost of roughly $2–$3 per kg of H₂ when the 1.92 m² module is scaled to a 10 MW‑class plant.

How it compares

Technology (typical commercial‑scale cost) Cost (USD / kg H₂)
Steam‑methane reforming (SMR, “gray” H₂) $1–$2 (fuel‑cost driven)
SMR with carbon capture (blue H₂) $2–$3 (adds capture penalty)
Conventional electrolysis (PEM, alkaline) $4–$6 (electricity‑intensive)
Solar‑thermal or photo‑electro‑chemical renewables $5–$8 (early‑stage, low‑temperature)
SunHydrogen photochemical module $2–$3

Thus, SunHydrogen’s target sits above the cheapest gray hydrogen from SMR but on par with blue hydrogen and well below the majority of renewable‑electrolysis pathways that dominate today’s “green” hydrogen market.

Trading implications

  • Cost‑advantage catalyst: If SunHydrogen can sustain a $2–$3 /kg cost at scale, the company could capture a sizable share of the emerging “low‑cost green” segment, positioning it as a direct competitor to blue‑hydrogen projects that rely on CCS. This cost profile should translate into stronger demand for its technology licences and potential offtake contracts, especially as carbon‑pricing regimes tighten.
  • Valuation upside: The market currently prices SunHydrogen at a premium to early‑stage peers (reflected in a 70 sentiment score). A demonstrated cost advantage would likely compress the discount to comparable renewable‑hydrogen peers and could trigger a re‑rating of the stock—a potential catalyst for a 15‑25 % upside in the next 6‑12 months.
  • Risk considerations: The projection assumes mature module scaling, stable solar‑irradiance sites, and low‑cost water handling. Any deviation (e.g., higher capital‑expenditure per MW, lower module efficiency, or water‑purification costs) could push the cost back toward $4 /kg, eroding the competitive edge. Keep a tight stop around the current support level (≈ $0.85 / share) until the next capital‑efficiency update or a confirmed offtake deal is announced.

Bottom line: SunHydrogen’s $2–$3 /kg target makes it competitive with blue hydrogen and markedly cheaper than most current green‑hydrogen routes. If the cost curve holds, the stock is primed for a fundamentally‑driven rally, but traders should monitor scaling‑risk metrics and any forward‑contract announcements for confirmation.