What are the projected cost per kilogram of hydrogen produced at commercial scale, and how does it stack up against conventional steamâmethane reforming and other renewable hydrogen technologies?
Projected cost
SunHydrogenâs own modelling (released in its investor deck after the live demo) projects a commercialâscale production cost of roughlyâŻ$2â$3âŻperâŻkg of Hâ when the 1.92âŻm² module is scaled to a 10âŻMWâclass plant.
How it compares
Technology (typical commercialâscale cost) | Cost (USDâŻ/âŻkg Hâ) |
---|---|
Steamâmethane reforming (SMR, âgrayâ Hâ) | $1â$2 (fuelâcost driven) |
SMR with carbon capture (blue Hâ) | $2â$3 (adds capture penalty) |
Conventional electrolysis (PEM, alkaline) | $4â$6 (electricityâintensive) |
Solarâthermal or photoâelectroâchemical renewables | $5â$8 (earlyâstage, lowâtemperature) |
SunHydrogen photochemical module | $2â$3 |
Thus, SunHydrogenâs target sits above the cheapest gray hydrogen from SMR but on par with blue hydrogen and well below the majority of renewableâelectrolysis pathways that dominate todayâs âgreenâ hydrogen market.
Trading implications
- Costâadvantage catalyst: If SunHydrogen can sustain a $2â$3âŻ/kg cost at scale, the company could capture a sizable share of the emerging âlowâcost greenâ segment, positioning it as a direct competitor to blueâhydrogen projects that rely on CCS. This cost profile should translate into stronger demand for its technology licences and potential offtake contracts, especially as carbonâpricing regimes tighten.
- Valuation upside: The market currently prices SunHydrogen at a premium to earlyâstage peers (reflected in a 70âŻsentiment score). A demonstrated cost advantage would likely compress the discount to comparable renewableâhydrogen peers and could trigger a reârating of the stockâa potential catalyst for a 15â25âŻ% upside in the next 6â12âŻmonths.
- Risk considerations: The projection assumes mature module scaling, stable solarâirradiance sites, and lowâcost water handling. Any deviation (e.g., higher capitalâexpenditure per MW, lower module efficiency, or waterâpurification costs) could push the cost back toward $4âŻ/kg, eroding the competitive edge. Keep a tight stop around the current support level (ââŻ$0.85âŻ/âŻshare) until the next capitalâefficiency update or a confirmed offtake deal is announced.
Bottom line: SunHydrogenâs $2â$3âŻ/kg target makes it competitive with blue hydrogen and markedly cheaper than most current greenâhydrogen routes. If the cost curve holds, the stock is primed for a fundamentallyâdriven rally, but traders should monitor scalingârisk metrics and any forwardâcontract announcements for confirmation.