Are there any regulatory or compliance risks associated with implementing the Section 382 rights plan? | HRTX (Aug 15, 2025) | Candlesense

Are there any regulatory or compliance risks associated with implementing the Section 382 rights plan?

Regulatory/compliance risk assessment

A Section 382 “rights‑plan” is a defensive device that limits a company’s ability to use its net operating loss (NOL) carry‑forwards after a change of control. While the plan itself is permissible under U.S. tax law, it is subject to extensive IRS scrutiny. The IRS may challenge the plan if it believes the rights‑plan was adopted primarily to preserve tax attributes rather than for legitimate business reasons, or if the plan is deemed “sham” or overly restrictive. In such cases, the IRS can impose a “section‑382 limitation” that reduces or eliminates the NOL benefit, leading to a material loss of shareholder value. Moreover, the SEC expects full, transparent disclosure of the rights‑plan in proxy statements and SEC filings; any omission or ambiguous language could trigger SEC enforcement or shareholder litigation. Finally, the company must ensure compliance with Nasdaq listing rules (e.g., timely filing of Form 8‑K, proper corporate governance procedures) to avoid a potential delisting risk.

Trading implications

Investors should monitor two key risk drivers: (1) any regulatory filings or SEC comments that suggest the rights‑plan may be deemed non‑compliant or insufficiently disclosed—this could trigger a short‑term sell‑off as investors price in the possibility of a future tax‑benefit erosion; and (2) any IRS guidance or court precedents that affect the enforceability of similar Section 382 plans, which could affect the valuation of the NOL asset pool. If the plan passes regulatory muster, the protection of the NOLs is a positive catalyst for the stock, as the company’s future cash‑flow prospects become more resilient, supporting a higher multiple on a biotech with limited profitability. Conversely, heightened regulatory risk should be priced in as a downside‑risk premium. In practice, consider a modest long‑position with a tight stop (e.g., 8‑10 % below current price) and keep a watch list for any SEC comment letters or IRS rulings within the next 3‑6 months; an adverse regulatory event would justify a quick exit, whereas a clean compliance record would support a modest upside thesis.