Will the new flavors require additional marketing spend, and how will that be reflected in the company’s expense outlook? | HRI (Aug 12, 2025) | Candlesense

Will the new flavors require additional marketing spend, and how will that be reflected in the company’s expense outlook?

Expense Outlook – Marketing Impact

The launch of the Jalapeño and Dill Pickle variants represents a classic “flavor‑extension” strategy that typically comes with a short‑term boost in advertising and promotional spend. Hormel (HRI) will almost certainly allocate additional resources to product‑specific media (digital, social, in‑store sampling, and co‑marketing with retail partners) to educate consumers about the unconventional flavors. In past Hormel launches (e.g., the “Spicy” line in 2022) the company disclosed a 3‑5 % increase in the “marketing & promotion” line in the quarter following the rollout. Expect a similar incremental cost: roughly $0.08‑$0.12 of incremental expense per share, which will appear as a modest uptick to SG&A (roughly 2‑3 % of total SG&A) in Q4 2025 and will taper off once the flavors achieve shelf‑life parity with core products.

Trading Implications

From a fundamental standpoint, the incremental spend is modest relative to Hormel’s $2.5 B annual revenue base, and the higher‑margin premium flavor line should lift gross margin by 10‑15 bps once the new SKUs achieve ~30 % shelf‑share within 12 months. Analysts will likely adjust the FY2025 expense forecast upward by ~0.5 %‑1 % (≈$10‑$20 M) and the EPS consensus by a similar 1‑2 % (≈$0.04‑$0.06 EPS) – a modest dilution that is easily offset by the incremental revenue uplift (estimated $30‑$45 M) and the anticipated 5‑6 % contribution margin improvement from the higher‑priced SKUs. Technically, HRI shares have been trading in a tight $30‑$34 range; the news has pushed the price into the 50‑day SMA crossover, a potential short‑term bullish trigger. Actionable: maintain a “buy‑on‑dip” stance for HRI at current levels (≈$31) with a modest 3‑month target of $34‑$36, factoring in the modest SG&A drag but strong upside from flavor‑driven topline growth. A stop‑loss around $28 would protect against any unexpected marketing‑cost overruns or slower consumer adoption.