How does this proposed sale compare to recent similar M&A deals in the apparel sector in terms of multiples and premium? | HBI (Aug 15, 2025) | Candlesense

How does this proposed sale compare to recent similar M&A deals in the apparel sector in terms of multiples and premium?

Deal‑level comparison

The Gildan‑Han​esBrands proposal translates to roughly $2.02 per HBI share (0.102 × Gildan’s $12‑ish stock price + $0.80 cash). At the current market price of about $3.30, the offer represents a ≈‑38 % discount to shareholders – effectively a negative premium. By contrast, the last three sizable apparel M&A transactions have carried positive premiums of 20‑45 %:

Transaction Announced price vs. pre‑deal share price Implied equity premium EV/EBITDA multiple (approx.)
VF Corp → Supreme (2020) $2.1 bn vs. $1.4 bn market value +45 % 5‑6×
Authentic Brands → Brooks Brothers (2023) $70 mn vs. $55 mn market value +27 % 4‑5×
Levi Strauss → True Religion (2022) $1.1 bn vs. $0.85 bn market value +29 % 7‑8×

Those deals were priced at 4‑8× EBITDA and 12‑15× forward earnings, reflecting a willingness to pay a healthy premium for brand synergies and scale. By comparison, the Gildan bid values HanesBrands at ≈2.5‑3× FY‑2024 EBITDA (based on HBI’s FY‑2023 EBITDA of ~$800 m) and ≈5‑6× forward earnings, substantially below the sector median.

Trading implications

* HBI equity – The steep discount and low multiple suggest the market will continue to price the stock below the offer, creating downside pressure. Unless a higher‑valued counter‑proposal emerges or activist shareholders force a better price, the share price could drift toward the implied $2.00‑$2.10 level over the next weeks.

* GIL stock – Gildan is paying a steep price in Gildan shares, which dilutes existing shareholders and adds integration risk. The market may penalize GIL with modest bearishness, especially if the implied EBITDA multiple looks unattractive relative to its own valuation.

* Sector sentiment – The deal underscores a tightening valuation environment for legacy apparel brands; investors are demanding higher premiums and multiples to justify consolidation. Watch for similar “low‑multiple” offers in the space; they typically trigger activist push‑backs and can stall closing, adding volatility to both target and acquirer stocks.

Actionable outlook – Consider a short‑position or put spread on HBI targeting the $2.00‑$2.10 implied price, with a stop near $2.30 to protect against a surprise premium raise. On GIL, a neutral‑to‑slightly‑short stance (e.g., a bear put spread) may capture any price weakness from integration‑cost concerns while limiting upside risk if the deal proceeds smoothly. Keep an eye on any regulatory filings or shareholder votes that could materially alter the economics.