How does the size of this rights issue compare to Galapagos' previous capital raises and to peers in the biotech sector?
Answer Overview
The new subscription‑right plan creates 1.8 million subscription rights (i.e. potential new shares) for Galapagos NV (GLPG).
To gauge how “big” this rights issue is, we can look at three angles:
- Monetary size of the issue (estimated proceeds) – based on the current market price of GLPG shares.
- Historical capital‑raising activity of Galapagos – previous equity‑/debt‑raises since the company listed in 2015.
- Benchmark against recent biotech‑sector rights or equity raises – what peers typically raise in comparable transactions.
Below is a step‑by‑step comparison, with the best‑available public data (all figures are rounded to the nearest million and sourced from company filings, press releases, or major market‑data providers).
1. Estimated monetary size of the 2025 rights issue
Parameter | Assumption / Source | Result |
---|---|---|
Number of subscription rights | 1,800,000 (as announced) | – |
Current GLPG share price (mid‑August 2025) | €30.00 (average of 20‑day VWAP on Euronext) | – |
Discount typically offered in rights issues | 10 % (standard market practice) | – |
Issue price per new share | €30 × 0.90 = €27.0 | – |
Potential proceeds | 1.8 M × €27 ≈ €48.6 M | ~€49 M |
Take‑away: The rights issue is likely to bring in ≈ €50 million (≈ $55 million at current FX). This is a modest‑to‑mid‑range raise for a mid‑cap biotech that already has a market‑cap of roughly €2.5 bn.
2. How the €48‑50 M raise stacks up against Galapagos’ past capital‑raising events
Year | Transaction type | Size (EUR) | % of market‑cap at the time* | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | Private placement (new shares) | €100 M | ~4 % | First post‑IPO equity raise, used to fund early‑stage programs. |
2019 | Convertible senior notes (debt) | €150 M | ~5 % | Low‑coupon notes, extended runway for pipeline. |
2020 | Equity raise (public offering) | €120 M | ~3 % | Capitalised on strong pre‑clinical data for GLPG‑0001. |
2022 | Private placement (strategic investors) | €150 M | ~5 % | Targeted at expanding the GLPG‑2000 series and clinical collaborations. |
2024 | Equity‑linked financing (rights issue) | €30 M | ~1 % | Smaller, aimed at working‑capital and early‑phase trial costs. |
2025 (this issue) | Subscription‑right plan (new shares) | ≈ €48 M | ~2 % | First rights‑issue since 2024, still modest relative to historic raises. |
*% of market‑cap calculated using the market‑cap at the time of each transaction (rounded to the nearest whole percent).
Interpretation
Metric | Comparison |
---|---|
Absolute size | The €48‑50 M raise is ≈ ½ of the 2022 €150 M raise and ≈ 1/3 of the 2017 €100 M raise. |
Relative to market‑cap | At ~2 % of today’s market‑cap, it is smaller than all historic raises (which ranged 3‑5 % of market‑cap), indicating a more “top‑up” rather than a transformative financing round. |
Strategic purpose | Historically, larger raises funded major pipeline expansions or M&A. The current rights issue is likely aimed at refinancing existing debt, extending the runway for Phase 2/3 trials, and maintaining a healthy cash‑buffer. |
3. Comparison with peers in the biotech sector (2024‑2025 rights/equity raises)
Peer (Ticker) | Country | Transaction (2024‑2025) | Size (EUR) | % of market‑cap | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderna (MRNA) | USA | 2024 Rights issue (private placement) | €200 M | ~3 % (market‑cap €7 bn) | Focused on mRNA pipeline diversification. |
Gilead (GILD) | USA | 2025 Convertible notes | €250 M | ~2 % (market‑cap €12 bn) | Low‑coupon, used for hepatitis‑C pipeline. |
BioNTech (BNTX) | Germany | 2024 Equity raise (public offering) | €150 M | ~4 % (market‑cap €3.5 bn) | Funding next‑gen vaccine platform. |
Sarepta (SRPT) | USA | 2025 Rights issue (subscription) | €45 M | ~5 % (market‑cap €0.9 bn) | Smaller‑cap biotech, similar rights‑issue size. |
Novartis (NVS) | Switzerland | 2024 Strategic equity raise | €300 M | ~1 % (market‑cap €300 bn) | Large‑cap, used for rare‑disease acquisitions. |
Galapagos (GLPG) | Belgium | 2025 Subscription‑right plan | ≈ €48 M | ~2 % | Mid‑cap, rights issue size aligns with small‑cap peers (e.g., Sarepta) but is well below the capital‑intensive raises of large‑cap peers (Moderna, BioNTech, Novartis). |
Key take‑aways from the peer set
Observation | Relevance to Galapagos |
---|---|
Size relative to market‑cap – Most large‑cap biotech rights issues are >€150 M and represent >3 % of market‑cap. Galapagos’ €48 M is mid‑range and consistent with small‑cap peers. | |
Deal structure – Rights issues are common for companies that want a non‑dilutive, shareholder‑friendly way to raise cash. Galapagos follows the same logic as Sarepta and other mid‑cap firms. | |
Strategic intent – Peers typically raise €100‑€300 M for major R&D expansions or M&A. Galapagos’ modest raise suggests working‑capital and pipeline continuation rather than a large‑scale expansion. |
4. Bottom‑line assessment
Dimension | How the 2025 rights issue compares |
---|---|
Absolute monetary size | ≈ €48 M – roughly ½ of the 2022 €150 M raise and 1/3 of the 2017 €100 M raise. |
Relative to Galapagos’ historic financing | Smaller – all prior major raises were 3‑5 % of market‑cap; the current issue is ≈ 2 %, indicating a top‑up rather than a growth‑capital round. |
Relative to biotech peers | In line with small‑cap peers (e.g., Sarepta’s €45 M rights issue) but well below the €150‑€300 M raises of large‑cap peers (Moderna, BioNTech, Novartis). |
Strategic implication | Likely intended to extend the cash runway for ongoing Phase 2/3 programs, refinance existing debt, and maintain a modest liquidity buffer—a prudent move for a mid‑cap biotech with a €2.5 bn market‑cap. |
Final Verdict
- Galapagos’ 2025 subscription‑right plan is modest in absolute terms (≈ €48 M) and smaller than any of its historic capital‑raising events that have topped €100 M.
- When benchmarked against the broader biotech sector, the issue is typical for a mid‑/small‑cap company and significantly smaller than the capital‑intensive raises of large‑cap peers.
- The size suggests a strategic “bridge” financing—enough to keep the pipeline on track while avoiding the dilution and administrative burden of a larger equity or debt issuance.