What does the enrollment rate and trial design suggest about the timeline for data readâouts and potential regulatory filing compared to other NMIBC geneâtherapy competitors?
Enrollment speed and trial design as a timeline cue
enGeneâs announcement that the pivotal CohortâŻ1 of the PhaseâŻ2 LEGEND trial has already hit its 100âpatient enrollment target is unusually fast for a NMIBC geneâtherapy study. The trial is openâlabel, multiâcohort and enrolls patients with highârisk, nonâmuscleâinvasive bladder cancerâa population that is relatively abundant and wellâcharacterized, allowing sites to screen and randomize quickly. Because the pivotal cohort is now fully accrued, the company can begin the planned safetyâfollowâup and efficacy readâout windows within the next 3â6âŻmonths. With a typical PhaseâŻ2 readâout window of 12â18âŻmonths after the last patientâfirstâdose, investors can reasonably expect the first efficacy data by Q4âŻ2025 and a potential regulatory filing (e.g., a BLA or FDAâtype âfastâtrackâ submission) in H1âŻ2026 if the data are compelling.
Relative position versus peers
Most NMIBC geneâtherapy rivalsâsuch as ImmunityBioâs Nâ803/Tâcell platform, Caladriusâs AdâCTL4, and Ferringâs oncolytic vectorsâhave either larger, staggered enrollment targets (150â200 pts) or are still in earlyâphase, singleâcohort studies that wonât finish enrollment until 2026â2027. Their timelines consequently push readâouts and filing dates into 2027 or later. enGeneâs aggressive enrollment and its rollingâcohort design therefore compress the dataâgeneration horizon, giving it a potential 12â18âmonth lead on competitors. From a trading perspective, the nearâterm catalyst (first readâout) could drive a shortâtoâmidâterm upside if data look favorable, while the earlier filing window creates a âregulatoryâevent tailâ that may attract speculative positioning ahead of a possible FDA decision. Conversely, any delay in safety signals or efficacy readâouts would disproportionately hurt enGene because the market has priced in this speed advantage relative to peers.