Short answer: The press release you provided does not contain any information about the consensus analyst revenue estimate for Clean Energy Fuels’ Q 2 2025 results. Therefore, we cannot say from this announcement alone whether the reported $102.6 million in revenue is above, below, or in line with analysts’ expectations.
Why we can’t answer the comparison from the given text
What the news tells us | What we don’t have |
---|---|
Revenue: $102.6 M in Q2 2025 (up from $98.0 M a year earlier) | Any analyst consensus figure (e.g., a $‑X M estimate) |
Net loss: $(20.2) M (GAAP) | Consensus EPS or other guidance |
Adjusted EBITDA (cut off in the excerpt) | The actual number, and any related analyst commentary |
Other operational highlights (e.g., 61.4 M RNG gallons sold) | Analyst expectations for those metrics |
Because the press release (as reproduced in your message) stops mid‑sentence and never mentions the analyst consensus estimate for revenue (or any guidance about “beat” or “miss”), we cannot determine whether the $102.6 M figure is:
- Ahead of consensus (a “beat”)
- Below consensus (a “miss”)
- Exactly in line with consensus
What you can do next
- Check analyst consensus data – platforms such as Bloomberg, FactSet, Refinitiv, S&P Global Market Intelligence, or Reuters typically publish consensus estimates for revenue and earnings.
- Look for the “Earnings Call” transcript or the full press release – Companies often add a “Management Commentary” section that directly states whether they “beat”, “met”, or “fell short of” analyst expectations.
- Contact investor relations – The investor‑relations team at Clean Energy Fuels (often listed on the “Investor Relations” page of the company’s website) can provide the consensus figure used in the analyst survey, or the company may disclose it in a subsequent “press release – earnings summary” or “conference call transcript”.
Bottom line
Based solely on the excerpt you’ve provided, there is no information about how the $102.6 M Q2 revenue stacks up against the consensus analyst estimate, so the comparison cannot be made without additional data. If you obtain the analyst consensus figure (e.g., $‑X M), you can then simply compare:
- If $102.6 M > Consensus → “Revenue beat analysts’ expectations.”
- If $102.6 M = Consensus → “Revenue matched consensus.”
- If $102.6 M < Consensus → “Revenue fell short of consensus.”
Feel free to provide the analyst estimate if you have it, and I’ll gladly tell you exactly how the reported revenue compares.