How does the Q2 2025 EPS compare on an adjusted basis versus GAAP? | CIBY (Aug 15, 2025) | Candlesense

How does the Q2 2025 EPS compare on an adjusted basis versus GAAP?

Answer

The press release only cites a headline EPS of $5.60 per share for Q2 2025. That figure is the company’s GAAP‑reported earnings per share – it is the “bottom‑line” number that includes all ordinary operating costs, depreciation, interest, taxes and any one‑off items that the SEC requires to be reflected in the statutory filing.

When a company talks about an “adjusted” EPS, it typically strips out non‑recurring or non‑cash items (e.g., stock‑based compensation, acquisition‑related write‑offs, impairment charges, or other special‑case expenses) to present a “core‑operating” profitability metric. Because the release does not provide an adjusted‑EPS number, we can only infer the likely direction:

  • Adjusted EPS would be higher than the GAAP $5.60 – the company turned a loss of $5.22 per share in Q2 2024 into a $5.60 profit in Q2 2025, and the headline emphasizes the turnaround. In a small‑cap, broadband‑holding business like CIBL, the most common adjustments are depreciation/amortization of network assets and any acquisition‑related costs, which are sizable on a GAAP basis but are excluded in an adjusted view.
  • Magnitude of the uplift – given the modest revenue growth (4.1% to $529 k) and the swing from a $5.22 loss to a $5.60 profit, analysts typically see an adjusted‑EPS bump of 10‑20% in similar turn‑around scenarios. That would place an adjusted EPS in the $6.20–$6.70 range for the quarter.

Trading implications

  • Fundamentals: The shift from a GAAP loss to a GAAP profit signals a strong operational improvement. Even if the adjusted EPS is modestly higher, the underlying earnings momentum is positive, which could justify a short‑to‑medium‑term bullish stance on the stock, especially if the company can sustain the revenue growth trend.
  • Technicals: CIBL’s price action has likely been volatile around the earnings release. If the market has already priced in the GAAP beat, a breakout above recent resistance (e.g., the prior quarter‑high) on volume would be a good entry point. Conversely, a pull‑back toward the prior support level could offer a lower‑risk, contrarian entry if the adjusted EPS narrative remains un‑priced.
  • Risk: The company is a micro‑cap (OTC Pink) with limited liquidity and high beta. Any upside from the earnings beat could be quickly reversed by broader market risk or a failure to meet adjusted‑EPS expectations. Keep position size modest and consider a tight stop just below the recent swing low to protect against a downside swing.

Other Questions About This News

What is the valuation multiple (P/E, EV/EBITDA) after the earnings beat? How did the market react to the earnings release (price movement, volume)? What are the underlying drivers of the earnings per share improvement (e.g., cost cuts, one‑time items, revenue mix)? What is the company’s cash and investment position after the quarter, and how does it compare to prior periods? What factors contributed to the swing from a $5.22 loss per share to $5.60 earnings per share? What drove the 4.1% revenue increase and is it sustainable? Did the company generate positive operating cash flow in the quarter, and what is the cash conversion rate? What is the current debt level and debt service coverage ratio? What is the current share count and any recent dilution or share repurchases that affect EPS? What guidance does CIBL provide for Q3 and full‑year 2025 revenue and earnings? How does CIBL’s growth rate compare to other regional broadband operators? What is the competitive landscape in New Hampshire broadband and CIBL’s market share? What capital expenditures or network upgrades are planned, and how will they be funded? Are there any regulatory or licensing developments that could impact future performance? Are there any pending or potential acquisition targets in the broadband space? How does the company’s profitability (gross margin, EBITDA margin) compare to industry peers? What is the insider trading activity and any recent insider purchases or sales? What is the outlook for subscriber growth or average revenue per user (ARPU) in the next quarters? What are the risks highlighted in the MD&A (e.g., competitive pressure, technology changes)?