What is the expected effect of the $3.8 million aged‑receivables write‑off on the company's net income and cash flow? | CDNA (Aug 06, 2025) | Candlesense

What is the expected effect of the $3.8 million aged‑receivables write‑off on the company's net income and cash flow?

Effect of the $3.8 million aged‑receivables write‑off

Accounting area What happens Why it matters
Net income (the “bottom‑line” on the income statement) Decreases by roughly $3.8 million (before any tax effect). The write‑off is recorded as an expense (or a reduction of “Other income/expense”) that directly reduces earnings for the quarter. A lower net‑income figure means the company reports a smaller profit (or a larger loss) for Q2 2025. Investors and analysts will view this as a hit to profitability, even though the amount is non‑cash.
Cash flow (statement of cash flows) No cash is actually spent; the $3.8 million is a non‑cash charge. Consequently, in the “Cash flows from operating activities” section the amount is added back to operating cash flow (i.e., cash flow is higher by $3.8 million compared with the cash‑generated amount before the add‑back). The cash‑flow line shows that the company’s ability to generate cash from its core operations is not impaired by the write‑off. In practice, the cash‑flow impact is neutral – the write‑off reduces reported earnings but improves the operating‑cash‑flow figure because the expense is reversed in the cash‑flow reconciliation.
Overall cash position Unchanged by the write‑off itself. Since the receivable was already “aged” (i.e., unlikely to be collected) and is removed from the balance‑sheet, the company does not experience an out‑of‑pocket cash outflow at the time of the write‑off. The balance‑sheet asset (aged receivable) is reduced, but the cash account is not affected. The only cash‑related effect would be any tax benefit (if the loss is tax‑deductible) that could generate a future cash tax refund, but that is not disclosed in the brief.

How the mechanics work

  1. Income‑statement impact

    • Debit an expense (or credit “Other income”) for $3.8 M.
    • Credit the “Allowance for doubtful accounts” (or directly reduce the receivable) for $3.8 M.
    • Result: Reduced net income by $3.8 M (pre‑tax). If a corporate tax rate were applied, the after‑tax effect would be slightly less (e.g., at a 25 % tax rate, net‑income would fall by $2.85 M after tax).
  2. Cash‑flow statement impact

    • In the “Net income” line of the cash‑flow statement, the $3.8 M expense is shown.
    • Under “Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities,” the $3.8 M is added back (or the allowance increase is subtracted) because it did not involve cash.
    • Operating cash flow therefore rises by $3.8 M (or by the after‑tax amount if the company adjusts for tax effects).
  3. Balance‑sheet impact

    • Assets: Aged receivable (an asset) is removed, lowering total assets by $3.8 M.
    • Equity: Retained earnings (part of equity) fall by the same amount, keeping the accounting equation balanced.

Bottom‑line answer to the question

  • Net income: The $3.8 million write‑off will reduce the company’s net income for Q2 2025 by roughly $3.8 million (pre‑tax). The reduction may be a bit smaller after accounting for any tax shield.
  • Cash flow: Because the write‑off is a non‑cash expense, the company will add the $3.8 million back in the operating‑cash‑flow section, resulting in no cash‑outflow and an increase in reported operating cash flow of the same amount (again, after‑tax adjustments could slightly modify the figure).

Thus, the write‑off hurts reported profitability but does not drain cash; instead, it improves the cash‑flow picture by being a non‑cash charge that is reversed in the cash‑flow reconciliation.